Skip to content
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG - Impact. Passion. IP.
  • UPC Decisions
  • UPC Knowledge-Base
  • About
  • UPC Special
  • bardehle.com
  • LD Munich, August 30, 2024, Decision on infringement action and counterclaim for revocation, UPC_CFI_52/2023

    Confirmation of CoA’s standard re. claim construction in 10x Genomics v. NanoString Technologies (UPC_CoA_335/2023 App_576355/2023): The UPC Court of Appeal proceeds from the following principles in accordance with Art. 69 of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents (EPC) and the Protocol on its Interpretation. The patent claim is not only the starting point,…

  • LD Paris, May 21, 2024, order concerning security for legal costs, UPC_CFI_495/2023

    Claimant’s financial situation is decisive when deciding on security for legal costs: The criterion of the Claimant’s financial situation is decisive for the Court when it has to decide whether or not to order a security for the legal costs. The Applicants (Defendants in the main proceedings) submitted that there are no public records about…

  • Court of Appeal, May 22, 2024, order concerning an expedition request, UPC_CoA_218/2024 et al.

    Requirements for request for expedition of proceedings pursuant to R.9.3 RoP : A request to expedite appeal proceedings, namely a request to shorten any deadlines where possible pursuant to R. 225(e), R.9.3 RoP, requires the Applicant (here: Volkswagen AG) to explain that and why it would have a particular interest in the concerned brief (here:…

  • Court of Appeal, February 8, 2024, order on representation for file inspection, UPC_CoA_404/2023

    File inspection requires representation by an authorised representative.: A member of the public who requests access to the Register pursuant to R.262.1(b) RoP is a “Party” pursuant to R.8.1 RoP and, thus, must be represented before the UPC by an authorised representative (pursuant to Art. 48 UPCA). This is meaningful, because such request must be…

  • LD Dusseldorf, February 14, 2024, order on confidentiality measures, UPC_CFI_463/2023

    CMS provides for graduated procedure for protection of confidential information : With(in) the R. 262A workflow, the UPC Case Management System (CMS) provides for a step-by-step procedure for the protection of confidential information, comprehensively taking into account the interests of both parties in confidentiality. : Before the unredacted version of a document submitted with an…

  • CD Paris, February 9, 2024, rejected request for time extension, UPC_CFI_412/2023

    Time extension only in exceptional cases: The power to extend a time limit should only be used with caution and only in justified exceptional cases (see UPC CFI 363/2023 LD Düsseldorf, order of 20 January 2024). A deadline set by the Rules of Procedures may only be extended in case a party alleges and gives…

←Previous Page
  • UPC Decisions
  • UPC Knowledge-Base
  • About
  • UPC Special
  • bardehle.com
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • SoundCloud
  • Facebook
  • Xing Xing

Latest UPC Decisions

  • LD Mannheim, October 20, 2026, infringement action, counterclaim for revocation, UPC_CFI_481/2025, UPC_CFI_1358/2025

  • LD Mannheim, October 23, 2026, Decision on Infringement and conditional CfR, UPC_CFI_706/2025 and UPC_CFI_1816/2025

  • LD The Hague, October 8, 2026 (published October 28, 2026), Order, UPC_CFI_0001615/2026

  • LD Munich, October 28, 2026, order to lay open books, UPC_CFI_1160/2026

  • LD The Hague, October 27, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_2594/2026, UPC_CFI_2595/2026

This service is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Legal Notices

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbB
Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte

Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 Munich
GERMANY

Fon: +49(0)89.928 05-0
Fax: +49(0)89.928 05-444
Email: info@bardehle.de

UPC Law

To the top ↑