Author: Sebastian Horlemann
-
LD Munich, 5 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_2/2023, ACT_459746/2023, App_577241/2023
Penalty payment does not require a further court order: In the event of violations of orders under Art. 62 UPCA, a penalty payment may be imposed without a further court enforcement order in accordance with Art. 82 (4) UPC The requirements for the imposition of penalty payments are exhaustively regulated in Art. 82 para. 4…
-
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023
A notification by the judge-rapporteur under Rule 20.2 RoP that a preliminary objection is to be dealt in the main proceedings cannot be challenged on appeal, nor can it be made the subject of a review by the panel pursuant to Rule 333.1 RoP.: The judge-rapporteur and not the panel shall decide on inadmissible applications…
-
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023
Possibility for parties to comment on separation of subject matter of extension of complaint due to procedural reasons.: Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023 Type of proceedings Action for infringement Parties Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Plaintiff)NETGEAR Deutschland GmbH, Netgear Inc. and Netgear International Limited (Defendants) Patent(s) EP3611989 and EP3678321 Body of legislation /…
-
LD Munich, 20 December 2023, order of court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_292/2023
The original version of a claim of an European patent and any amendments made thereto during the grant proceedings can be used as aid for interpreting the claim. : In principle, a party unsuccessfully applying for provisional measures has to bear the costs incurred by the other party for filing a protective letter.: Division Local…
-
LD Düsseldorf, 14 December 2023, order of court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_201/2023
which must be included in the Statement of defence (see R. 25.1 RoP).: Accordion paragraph Division Local Division Düsseldorf UPC number UPC_CFI_201/2023 Type of proceedings Action for infringement Parties N.V. Nutricia (Plaintiff)Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH (Defendant) Patent(s) EP 2 359 858 Body of legislation / Rules Rule 29.1 RoP Rule 25.1 RoP Rule 271.6…
-
Court of Appeal, 11 December 2023, order of the court of appeal of the UPC, UPC_CoA_404/2023, App_584498/2023
Procedural Court order allowing the parties to comment on several procedural aspects, in particular whether Rule 8 RoP applies.: Court Court of Appeal UPC number UPC_CoA_404/2023 Type of proceedings Appeal infringement proceedings Parties Ocado Innovation Limited (Plaintiff) and (1) Autostore AS(2) Autostore Sp. z o.o.(3) Autostore System AB(4) Autostore S.A.S.(5) Autostore System GmbH(6) Autostore System…
-
LD Munich, 4 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_213/2023, 220/2023, 224/2023
The determination of the date of service of the complaint and the grant of an extension of the deadline for the statement of defense in agreement with parties is possible.: Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_213/2023, 220/2023, 224/2023 Type of proceedings Action for infringement Parties Panasonic Holdings Corporation (Plaintiff) and 1 Xiaomi Inc.2 Beijing…
-
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023, App_587438/2023
the termination of limitation proceedings for such patent is admissible.: Rule 263 RoP allows the amendment of a pending case under certain conditions. In this case, the Plaintiff extended the pending complaint by asserting claims from a further patent, after the limitation proceedings for this patent were concluded. The court found this extension to be…
-
LD Düsseldorf, 1 December 2023, procedural order of the court of first instance, UPC_CFI_ 7/2023
Procedural order on how to proceed with the action for infringement and the counterclaim for revocation according to Rule 37 RoP : With this decision the LD Düsseldorf applied Rule 37.2 RoP and determined prior to the closure of the written procedure to proceed with both the action for infringement and with the counterclaim for…
-
LD Helsinki, Decision of 20 October 2023, UPC_CFI_214/2023
Withdrawal of opt-out ineffective: dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction: An infringement action and a request for provisional measures were filed based on European Patent EP 3 295 663 (EP’663). The LD Helsinki dismissed both due to lack of jurisdiction of the UPC Courts . EP’663 was opted out on May 12, 2023, and the…
-
LD The Hague, 18 October 2023, order on language of the proceedings, UPC_CFI_239/2023
Change language of proceedings: case-by-case decision, but time-limit to be observed: An infringement action was filed in Dutch before the LD The Hague. The Defendant and Applicant for the request, a small Spanish start-up, requested a change of the language of the proceedings into English which is the language of the granted European Patent. The…