Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Duesseldorf Local Division » LD Düsseldorf, 1 December 2023, procedural order of the court of first instance, UPC_CFI_ 7/2023

LD Düsseldorf, 1 December 2023, procedural order of the court of first instance, UPC_CFI_ 7/2023

2 min Reading time

Key takeaways

With this decision the LD Düsseldorf applied Rule 37.2 RoP and determined prior to the closure of the written procedure to proceed with both the action for infringement and with the counterclaim for revocation and to request the President of the Court of First Instance to allocate from the Pool of Judges in accordance with Article 18(3) a technically qualified judge with qualifications and experience in the field of technology concerned according to Art. 33 (3). Rule 37.2 RoP is an exception to Rule 37.1 RoP stating that as soon as practicable after the closure of the written procedure the panel shall decide by way of order how to proceed with respect to the application of Article 33 (3) of the UPCA. The main argument to apply the exception was procedural economic reasons.

Division

Düsseldorf Local Division

UPC number

UPC_CFI_ 7/2023

Type of proceedings

Action for infringement and counterclaim for revocation

Parties

Franz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG (Plaintiff)

Bette GmbH & Co. KG (Defendant)

Patent(s)

EP 3 375 337 B1

Body of legislation / Rules

  • Rule 37.2 RoP
  • Art. 33 (3) UPCA

Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

  • Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwalt), Commercial Mediator (MuCDR), UPC Representative, Counsel

  • Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwalt), UPC Representative, Partner

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field