Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Duesseldorf Local Division » LD Düsseldorf, 22 June 2023, order of provisional measures, UPC_CFI_177/2023

LD Düsseldorf, 22 June 2023, order of provisional measures, UPC_CFI_177/2023

3 min Reading time

Key takeaways

Provisional measures under Art. 62 UPCA do not require a patent for which validity as been previously confirmed in opposition proceedings or national nullity proceedings. The fact that the asserted patent was granted and no opposition or nullity action was filed provides sufficient basis for the validity of the asserted patent.

Costs for which a party requests an interim award and that go beyond the statutory court fees must be substantiated.

The introduction of the infringing product at a trade fair justifies the ex parte order of provisional measures one day after the start of the trade fair and on the same day of the filing of the application for provisional measures.

Division

Local Division Düsseldorf

UPC case number

UPC_CFI_177/2023

Type of proceedings

Request for provisional measures

Parties

Applicant:  

myStromer AG, Freiburgstraße 798, 3173 Oberwangen b Bern, Schweiz

Respondent:

Revolt Zycling AG, Allmendstraße 15, 8320 Fehraltdorf, Schweiz

Patent(s)

EP 2 546 134 B1

Jurisdictions

  • Germany
  • The Netherlands
  • France
  • Italy

Body of legislation / Rules

  • Art. 25 UPCA
  • Art. 62 UPCA
  • Rule 209.2 RoP
  • Rule 211.1 RoP
  • Rule 212.1 RoP

Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

  • Martin Drews

    Attorney-at-law (Rechtsanwalt), UPC Representative, Counsel

  • Jan Bösing

    Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwalt), UPC Representative, Partner

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field