Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Duesseldorf Local Division » LD Düsseldorf, February 23, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_463/2023

LD Düsseldorf, February 23, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_463/2023

Anita Peter

1 min Reading time

Table of Contents

  1. Key takeaways
  2. Division
  3. UPC number
  4. Type of proceedings
  5. Parties
  6. Patent(s)
  7. Jurisdictions
  8. Body of legislation / Rules

Key takeaways

Postponement of the start of a deadline until conclusion of secrecy protection proceedings according to R. 262A RoP is not compatible with the urgent nature of proceedings for provisional measures

✓

As made clear in procedural order ORD_8568/2024, none of the deadlines in such proceedings for provisional measures can be extended in view of the timely date of the oral hearing.

Division

LD Düsseldorf

UPC number

UPC_CFI_463/2023

Type of proceedings

Application for provisional measures

Parties

Applicant: 10x Genomics, Inc.

Respondent: Curio Bioscience Inc.

Patent(s)

EP 2 697 391 B1

Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 9.3(a) RoP

2024-02-23 LD Dusseldorf UPC_CFI_463-2023 ORD_9718-2024 App_9671-2024 anonymizedDownload

Was the article helpful?

Categories

Tags

More exciting articles on similar topics

Content not to be missed

  • Munich Local Division

    LD Munich, March 11, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_201/2024

    Timely lodging of statement of claim upon order of provisional measures: payment of court fees relevant (not timing of receipt): The applicant of provisional measures has to “start proceedings on the merits” of the case within 31 calendar days (or 20 working days, whichever is longer) from the date specified in the Court’s order (R. …
    →
  • Mannheim Local Division

    LD Mannheim, March 11, 2025, orders, UPC_CFI_159/2024, UPC_CFI_162/2024

    If infringement proceedings are ready for decision with regard to single national parts, decision should not be withheld if this would delay enforcement: This decision has gained relevance in light of the recent decisions on the long-arm jurisdiction (cf. CJEU, BSH v Electrolux (C-339/22); UPC LD Dusseldorf, Fujifilm v Kodak (UPC_CFI_355/2023) according to which the …
    →
  • Duesseldorf Local Division

    LD Düsseldorf, March 4, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_468/2024, UPC_CFI_687/2024

    Referral of Counterclaim for Revocation (Art. 33(3)(b) UPCA, R. 37.2 RoP): The Local Division Düsseldorf referred the counterclaim for revocation to the Central Division in Milan. The Parties had unanimously requested the, and requests by all parties will be granted unless strongcounterarguments require a different decision (UPC_CFI 14/2023 (LD Munich), Order of 2 February2024 – …
    →

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field