Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » The Hague Local Division » LD The Hague, 17 January 2024, Procedural order of court of first instance, UPC_CFI_239/2023

LD The Hague, 17 January 2024, Procedural order of court of first instance, UPC_CFI_239/2023

2 min Reading time

Key takeaways

The Defence to the Counterclaim for revocation and any Application to amend the patent pursuant to Rule 30 RoP must be filed within two months of service of a Statement of defence containing a Counterclaim for revocation. The separate official service of the counterclaim through the CMS – triggered by the (current) CMS set-up wherein it is necessary to start a new workflow to upload the defence/counterclaim once more in order to be able to pay the court fees – is not a relevant start date.

However, as the messages sent to the parties in this regard may have caused confusion, the judge-rapporteur extended the deadline to file the Defence to the Counterlcaim by 10 days taking into account the interests of both parties and the consideratoin to have speedy proceedings at the UPC with short time limits in accordance with R.ules331., 334(a) and 9.3(a) RoP. The date of filing of the defence to the Counterclaim will then be considered as the effective filing date of the reply in the infringement action as well and as the
start date for the filing of further submissions.

Division

Local Division (Section The Hague)

UPC number

UPC_CFI_239/2023

Type of proceedings

Infringement Action/Counterclaim for revocation

Parties

Claimant:

  • Plant-e Knowledge B.V. (Renkum, NL),
  • Plant-e B.V. (Renkum, NL)

Defendant: Arkyne Technologies S.L. (Barcelona, ES)

Patent(s)

EP 2137782

Body of legislation / Rules

R. 9.3(a) RoP; R. 29(a) RoP; R. 331 RoP; R. 334(a) RoP.


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field