Key takeaways
Extension of time limit for preliminary objection (R. 19 RoP)
An intended harmonization of the time limit regime as such does not constitute a reason for extending the time limit that runs for the party to which was successfully served at an earlier point in time. Rather, an alignment can also be achieved by shortening the time limit that runs for the party who was only served at a later date.
Usage of case management system at early stage of UPC
Working with the new procedural law and the case management system (CMS) poses considerable challenges for all parties involved. For this reason, a practicable approach to the challenges that arise is required in the initial period
Division
Local Division Munich
UPC number
UPC_CFI_15/2023
Type of proceedings
Infringement action
Parties
Claimant: Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (Irvine, US)
Defendants:
- Meril GmbH (Bonn, DE)
- Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. (Vapi, IN)
Patent(s)
EP 3 646 825 B1
Body of legislation / Rules
Rule 19.1 RoP