Institutions: Luxembourg Court of Appeal
-
CoA Luxembourg, June 19, 2025, application for rehearing, UPC_CoA_402/2024, UPC_CoA_405/2024
The circumstances on which the application for rehearing is based must not already have been know during the first instance or appeal proceedings.: Art. 81(1) UPCA offers the possibility to request a rehearing after a final decision when, it is based on an act which has been held to constitute a criminal offence or in…
7 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, June 6, 2025, decision, UPC_CoA_618/2024
Deadline for filing an application for a cost decision in proceedings re provisional measures : If the successful party wishes to obtain a decision on costs, it must submit an application for the determination of costs within one month of service of the decision. The one-month period for filing an application for the determination of…
3 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
Court of Appeal, June 6, 2025, procedural order, UPC_CoA_434/2025
Requirements for suspensive effect of an appeal: An appeal shall only be granted suspensive effect if the circumstances of the case justify an exception. This may be the case for orders of communication of information according to Art. 67 UPCA. However, the risk of irreparable harm, if the suspensive effect is not granted, has to…
3 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, May 30, 2025, Orders, UPC_CoA_845/2024, UPC_CoA_50/2025
Appeals and cross-appeals are broadly admissible, but the Court will not worsen the position of the appealing party (reformatio in peius) (Art. 73(2) UPCA, R. 220.1, R. 226(b) RoP).: The Court apportions costs based on the degree of success, considering equity and the reasonableness of the parties’ positions. Orders to communicate information must specify a…
5 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, June 2, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_156/2025
UPC competence is not temporally limited (Art. 32(1) UPCA).: The Court’s jurisdiction extends to acts of infringement before the UPCA’s entry into force, provided the patent is within the UPC’s competence at the time of action. The absence of a temporal limitation in Art. 32(1) UPCA aligns with the UPCA’s objective to unify patent litigation…
4 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, May 23, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_7/2025
Withdrawal of appeal permitted where both parties consent and no legitimate interest remains (Rule 265.1 RoP).: The Court of Appeal allowed the claimant to withdraw the appeal after the respondent consented, as neither party had a legitimate interest in continuing the proceedings. 40% reimbursement of court fees granted for withdrawal before closure of interim procedure…
3 min Reading time→ -
CoA, May 28, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_808/2024
Reimbursement of fees: no extension of written procedure by opportunity for further written submissions.: In appeal proceedings (without cross-appeal), the written procedure ends with the submission of the statement of response by the respondent pursuant to R 235, R 239.1 RoP. The written procedure is not extended if the parties are allowed to file further…
2 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, May 21, 2025, order on application for suspensive effect, UPC_CoA_365/2025
Order of suspensive effect of an appeal requires exceptional circumstances: Pursuant to Article 74(1) UPCA, an appeal does not have suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise upon a reasoned request by a party. The Court of Appeal may therefore only grant such a request if the circumstances of the case justify an…
3 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, May 12, 2025, order on appeal against order for security of costs, especially when the action has become devoid of purpose, UPC_CoA_328/2024
Admissibility of Appeals: An appeal against an order for security of costs, brought together with an appeal against an order on provisional measures remains admissible, even if the request has become devoid of purpose (here because the appellant has later made it clear that it no longer requests provisional measures). The appellant retains a legal…
3 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, April 11, 2025, Amendment of claim and addition of a defendant, UPC_CoA_169/2025
Discretion of the Court of First Instance when applying Rules on amendment of claims and addition of parties (Rule 263 and 305 RoP).: The Court of First Instance has a broad discretion when considering allowance of amendments to claims and the addition of parties under Rule 263 and 305 RoP. The Court of Appeal clarified…
5 min Reading time→ -
UPC Court of Appeal, order of April 30, 2025, UPC_CoA_5/2025 (see also UPC_CoA_237/2025)
Order regarding request for stay of proceedings (R. 295 RoP): In an action for revocation, where both parties agreed to a stay, the appeal proceedings have been stayed pending the outcome of parallel opposition proceedings before the EPO Boards of Appeal, where the opposition proceedings could be expected to result in a final decision soon…
1 min Reading time→ -
UPC Court of Appeal, Order of April 30, 2025, UPC_CoA_768/2024
Claim construction principles: The interpretation of a patent claim is a matter of law. Therefore, the Court cannot leave the judicial task of interpreting the patent claim to an expert but has to construe the claim independently. The skilled person is a notional entity that cannot be equated with any real person in the technical…
3 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxemburg, April 18, 2025, application for suspensive effect, UPC_CoA_166/2025
Suspensive effect of an appeal must only be ordered in exceptional circumstances: The application for suspensive effect is admissible but must be dismissed as unfounded. A order on suspensive effect may be considered, for instance, if the appealed order or decision is manifestly erroneous, or if the appeal becomes devoid of purpose in the absence…
2 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxembourg, March 24, 2025, procedural order UPC_CoA_835/2024
Submissions after the conclusion of written proceedings are not admissible: Additional grounds of appeal that are not raised within the time limit for the statement of grounds of appeal provided for in R. 224.2 RoP are inadmissible, R. 233.3 RoP A further exchange of written pleadings may be permitted at the reasoned request of a…
2 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, March 26, 2025, allocation of costs, UPC_CoA_290/2024
Prevailing claimant to exceptionally bear costs: An exception to the general rule of Art. 69 (1) UPCA, which requires the unsuccessful party to bear the reasonable legal costs and expenses of the successful party, applies if a claimant files a revocation action without the patent holder prompting it and the holder surrenders the patent immediately…
4 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, March 3, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_523/2024
Price erosion is an important factor to be considered when evaluating the necessity of provisional measures. : A move from a market situation where only one product is available, to one where there are two competing products, can be expected to lead not just to price pressure but to a permanent price erosion. This risk…
4 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, February 19, 2025, order on release of cost security, UPC_CoA_217/2024
R. 352.2 RoP is applied by way of analogy with regard to the release of security for legal costs.: R. 352.2 RoP directly concerns the release of a security for enforcement but should be applied by way of analogy in a case in which security for legal costs has been deposited and afterwards the action…
1 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.