Topics: application to review pursuant to R. 333.1 RoP
-
LD Hamburg, 25 January 2024, decision, UPC_CFI_559935/2023
Background: The plaintiff filed a claim for damages subsequent to a German patent infringement case in which the defendant had been found to infringe the German part of EP 1 740 740 B1. The defendant objected to the jurisdiction of the court regarding the damages claim. This objection was allowed by the judge-rapporteur, as per…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 30 January 2024, procedural order (review R.333), UPC_CFI_230/2023
Amount of fine in the event of a breach of a confidentiality order: The decision relates to a review according to Rule 333 RoP of point 6.) of a confidentiallity order issued by the judge rapporteur on 19 December 2023. It emphasized that while the Paris and Munich orders pertain to the same protected confidential…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Paris, 24 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_230/2023
Review Procedure comes before Appeal Process: Case management decisions must first be reviewed by the panel under Rule 333 RoP before they can be appealed under Rule 220 RoP (cf. UPC Court of Appeal (n°486/2023, §6). Consequently, if the review under Rule 333 RoP of a confidentiality order is still pending, a request for leave…
2 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxembourg, 11 January 2024, order concerning request for discretionary review, UPC_CoA_486/2023
Nature of “notice” pursuant to R. 20.2 RoP to be determined.: It remains to be determined whether this “notice” is a decision / order. Competence concerning application to review pursuant to R. 333.1 RoP to be determined.: It remains to be determined whether the judge rapporteur or the panel is competent. Exceptionally, a request for…
3 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.