Topics: Art. 33(3) UPCA
-
LD Düsseldorf, November 21, 2024, Order on joint hearing of both infringement action and counterclaim for revocation, UPC_CFI_499/2023
Joint hearing of both infringement action and counterclaim for revocation: The local division exercises its discretion to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA). Such a joint hearing of the infringement action and the counterclaim seems to be appropriate in particular for reasons of efficiency. It is also preferable…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, June 20, 2024, Order of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_459/2023
Order to jointly hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation pursuant to Article 33(3)(a) UPCA for reasons of efficiency: Pursuant to Art. 33(3) UPCA, the LD can exercise its discretion when deciding to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA) or to refer the counterclaim for…
3 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Munich, February 2, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_14/2023
Request of referral of a counterclaim for revocation to the Central Division by the parties (Art. 33(3)(c) UPCA): According to Article 33(3)(c) UPCA, a Local Division may refer the case for decision to the central division based on the agreement of the parties. Strong counterarguments would be necessary for the Local Division not to grant…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, 15 February 2024, R.9 Order on the Application of Art. 33(3) UPCA, UPC_CFI_239/2023
No bifurcation of infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (as unanimously requested by the parties): A joint hearing of the infringement action and the counterclaim seems to be appropriate in particular for reasons of procedural expediency and avoids the risk of delay that might be involved with bifurcating. It is also preferable because it allows…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, February 15, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_239/2023
1. Decision against bifurcation before closure of written procedure: The Local Division The Hague decided to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA) and not to bifurcate. This desicsion was taken before the closure of the written procedure (R. 37.2 RoP) for practical reasons. The decision was in conformity…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Düsseldorf, 1 December 2023, procedural order of the court of first instance, UPC_CFI_ 7/2023
Procedural order on how to proceed with the action for infringement and the counterclaim for revocation according to Rule 37 RoP : With this decision the LD Düsseldorf applied Rule 37.2 RoP and determined prior to the closure of the written procedure to proceed with both the action for infringement and with the counterclaim for…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Düsseldorf, 22 November 2023, order on joint proceedings of infringement action and counterclaim for revocation, UPC_CFI_260/2023
The decision on how to proceed with the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation can be made before the conclusion of the written procedure.: Even if the panel is to decide by order on the procedure under Article 33 (3) UPCA as soon as possible after the conclusion of the written procedure pursuant to…
3 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.