Topics: case management
-
CD Milan, July 29, 2026, procedural order, UPC_CFI_1902/2025
Pragmatic solution for alignment of deadlines and service : The Claimant lodged an infringement action against two Defendants, Ziwu registered in China and Resosport registered in Hong Kong. Service was duly effected on Ziwu but not on Resosport. Ziwu thus requested an alignment of deadlines against acceptance of service by Resosport. Claimant opposed to the…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 19 February 2024, order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_9/2023
Example of exercise of the case management powers of the court under R. 334 RoP.: A videoconference with the parties can be designated a separate hearing under Rule 334(d) RoP, which does not preclude an interim conference under Rule 35(b) RoP. Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_9/2023 Type of proceedings Infringement Action Parties Claimant:…
1 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
Court of Appeal, 11 December 2023, order of the court of appeal of the UPC, UPC_CoA_404/2023, App_584498/2023
Procedural Court order allowing the parties to comment on several procedural aspects, in particular whether Rule 8 RoP applies.: Court Court of Appeal UPC number UPC_CoA_404/2023 Type of proceedings Appeal infringement proceedings Parties Ocado Innovation Limited (Plaintiff) and (1) Autostore AS(2) Autostore Sp. z o.o.(3) Autostore System AB(4) Autostore S.A.S.(5) Autostore System GmbH(6) Autostore System…
1 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.