Topics: R. 263 RoP
-
LD Munich, February 28, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_483/2024
Amendment of case (Rule 263 RoP): The claimant sought to amend the case to include the Netherlands after the patent was restored there. The application was made under Rule 263 of the Rules of Procedure (RoP) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Reasonable Diligence Requirement (Rule 263.2(a) RoP) : The claimant failed to demonstrate reasonable…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Helsinki, February 11, 2025, procedural order regarding changes in a case, UPC_CFI_214/2013
The main issues to be considered when addressing the admissibility of changes in a case are that the nature of the frontloaded procedure of the UPC must be protected and that during the process there are no such changes that the defendant’s right to defence is compromised.: If these two premises are protected there is…
3 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
CoA, December 23, 2024, oder concerning an application for a discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP)
Unconditional right to limit claims for damages (R. 263.3 RoP): An unconditional application to reduce the amount of damages claimed shall be considered as an unconditional application under Rule 263.3 RoP. Leave to limit a claim in an action unconditionally shall always be granted. Procedure for determining the value of the action (R. 22, 104,…
2 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, November 21, 2024, Order, UPC_CoA_456/2024
Not every new argument constitutes an “amendment of a case” requiring a party to apply for leave under R. 263 RoP. : A case is amended when the nature or scope of the dispute changes. For example, in an infringement case, this occurs if the plaintiff invokes a different patent or objects to a different…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, August 6, 2024, application for leave to change claim, UPC_CFI_41/2024
Strict application of R. 263.1 RoP regarding a party’s application for leave to change its claim: Pursuant to R. 263.2 RoP, leave shall not be granted if the party seeking the amendment cannot satisfy the Court that (a) the amendment could not have been made with reasonable diligence at an earlier stage and (b) the…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, May 14, 2024, Request for leave to change claim, UPC_CFI_457/2023
The concretization of the claims by the claimant is not a mere clarification, but a subsequent unconditional and therefore always admissible limitation/change of the claim within the meaning of R. 263 (3) RoP: According to the wording of the statement of claim, the action was initially directed against all computers and electronic end devices of…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023, App_587438/2023
the termination of limitation proceedings for such patent is admissible.: Rule 263 RoP allows the amendment of a pending case under certain conditions. In this case, the Plaintiff extended the pending complaint by asserting claims from a further patent, after the limitation proceedings for this patent were concluded. The court found this extension to be…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.