Topics: R. 275.2 RoP
-
LD Düsseldorf, February 2, 2026, Procedural orders of good service of PI decisions, UPC_CFI_449/2025 and UPC_CFI_515/2025
The publication of an order on the Court’s website, of which the Defendant had been notified via email, constitutes good service if there are no other effective means of informing the Defendant of the preliminary injunction and the ordering of further provisional measures.: In both cases, UPC_CFI_449/2025 and UPC_CFI_515/2025, the Court had previously ordered in…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Düsseldorf, November 11, 2025, UPC_CFI_515_2025
Proper service of application of provisional measures when service via the official route fails: If an application for provisional measures is to be served under the Hague Convention, and the authority responsible for the service does not effect service for several months, the Court may deem the steps taken so far sufficient for proper service.…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Düsseldorf, October 16, 2025, order re. service of PI request under the Hague Convention
If an application for provisional measures is to be served under the Hague Convention, and the authority responsible for the service informs the Court several months after the request that service cannot be effected because the defendant does not exist at the provided address, the Court may deem the steps taken so far sufficient for…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, 8 September 2023, procedural order re. alternative method of service, UPC_CFI_219/2023
Mandatory requirement of R. 275.2 RoP is a previous attempt to effect service in accordance with R. 270 to 274 RoP : R. 270 to 274 RoP do not provide for the possibility of service at a place of business within the Contracting Member States for defendants having their seat outside thereof; R. 271.5 RoP…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 4 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_213/2023, 220/2023, 224/2023
The determination of the date of service of the complaint and the grant of an extension of the deadline for the statement of defense in agreement with parties is possible.: Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_213/2023, 220/2023, 224/2023 Type of proceedings Action for infringement Parties Panasonic Holdings Corporation (Plaintiff) and 1 Xiaomi Inc.2 Beijing…
1 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.