Topics: Rule 194
-
LD Düsseldorf, May 4, 2026, review of an order to preserve evidence, request for the expert’s recusal, UPC_CFI_1696/2025
There is a basis for concern regarding an expert’s bias if – from the perspective of a knowledgeable and reasonable observer – certain circumstances give rise to justified doubts as to the expert’s impartiality or independence i.e., there is a likelihood that the expert’s decision will be influenced by factors other than the aforementioned duties.:…
5 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Milan, 13 June 2023, order by the standing judge, UPC_CFI_127/2023
Extreme urgency not found by standing judge, and proceedings forwarded to the presiding judge: By virtue of Rule194.4 RoP, the standing judge, appointed in accordance with Rule 345.5 RoP, in cases of extreme urgency may decide immediately on an application to preserve evidence and on the procedure to be followed. In the case at hand,…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.