Home » Rule 9.2 RoP

Topics: Rule 9.2 RoP

Published: December 6, 2024

Duesseldorf Local Division

LD Düsseldorf, November 29, 2024, procedural order rejecting submission, UPC_CFI_355/2023

Absent a reasoned request, and consequently a decision allowing further submissions, the Court will rejcect any submissions made after the stipulated periods.: Pursuant to R. 36 RoP, the judge-rapporteur may, on a reasoned request by a party, allow further written submissions to be exchanged within a period to be specified.In the case at hand, the…

2 min Reading time

→
Contact us personally!

Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.

Make an inquiry now

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Yes, I consent to the collection, processing and use of my above-mentioned personal data for the purposes of processing my message and for the purposes of contacting me via email. The legal basis of the processing shall be formed by my consent pursuant to Art. 6 (1) lit. a GDPR. The data will be deleted three months after expiry of the purpose, provided that longer retention periods are not required by law. I can revoke this consent with future effect at any time. I have taken note of the privacy statement and consent to it. With regard to the processing of my data, I am entitled to inalienable rights, information on which can be found in the privacy statement.

* = Required field

Topics: Rule 9.2 RoP

LD Düsseldorf, November 29, 2024, procedural order rejecting submission, UPC_CFI_355/2023

Contact us personally!

Stay in the loop

CoA, January 15, 2025 order concerning the need to adjudicate UPC_CoA_584-2024

LD Munich, January 10, 2025, order in cost reimbursment procedure, UPC_CFI_249/2023

CD Paris, September 16, 2024, decision by default in revocation action, UPC_CFI_412/2023

LD Vienna, January 15, 2025, order in first instance on infringement, UPC_CFI_33/2024

CoA, January 15, 2025, order on withdrawal, UPC_CoA_629/2024