Home » UPC decisions » Luxembourg Court of Appeal » CoA, August 25, 2025, procedural order, UPC_CoA_758/2015 and UPC_CoA_759/2025

CoA, August 25, 2025, procedural order, UPC_CoA_758/2015 and UPC_CoA_759/2025

2 min Reading time

Key takeaways

Although R.223.5 RoP provides that there shall be no suspensive effect for an order pursuant to (amongst other) R.220.2 RoP, the Court of Appeal considers that this does not preclude that an application for suspensive effect is lodged – and if justified, granted – for such orders based on the prevalence of Art. 74 UPCA. Although suspensive effect may not be excluded from the outset, the Court of Appeal can grant the application only if the circumstances of the case justify an exception to the principle that the appeal has no suspensive effect. An exception to the principle that an appeal has no suspensive effect may apply if the appealed order or decision is manifestly erroneous, or if the appeal becomes devoid of purpose in the absence of suspensive effect.

Division

Court of Appeal

UPC number

UPC_CoA_758/2015 and UPC_CoA_759/2025

Type of proceedings

Place type of proceedings

Parties

Sun Patent Trust vs. Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd, Vivo Tech GmbH, Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia SL

Patent(s)

EP 3 852 468

Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 223 RoP


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

  • Lisa Fleidl, Attorney-at-Law at BARDEHLE PAGENBERG

    Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwältin), UPC Representative

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field