Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Düsseldorf Local Division, July 20, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_209/2026

Düsseldorf Local Division, July 20, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_209/2026

3 min Reading time

Key takeaways

The Court attempted to serve the SoC on Defendants domiciled in China pursuant to The Hague Convention and in accordance with R. 274.1 (a) (2) of the RoP. However, the competent Chinese authority stated in each case the “[t]he recipient refused to accept the documents.” The Court found that the refusal of service without giving any reason by a defendant strongly indicates that other alternative methods will also be rejected, making further service attempts prior to a R. 275.2 RoP order unnecessary.

Although Claimant had requested service by public notice and the SoC to be deemed served 30 days after such notice, the Court directly ruled that the steps already taken to bring the SoC to Defendants’ attention constituted good service under R. 275.2 RoP. The Court thereby reaffirmed its prior case law, holding that where no viable alternative service options exist, an order under R. 275.1 RoP is not applicable.

The Court found R. 275.4 RoP to be satisfied since Art. 95 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People´s Republic of China permits “public service” as an alternative method for service.

Division

Local Division Düsseldorf

UPC number

UPC_CFI_209/2026

Type of proceedings

Procedural order on service

Parties

Claimant:
LiNA Medical AG (represented by Carl-Alexander Dinges, Daniel Hoppe, Konstantin Schallmoser, and Dr. Alexander Harguth)

Defendants:
Tonglu Qianyan Medtech Co., Ltd.
Mr. Sam Lee
Eunitor GmbH

Patent(s)

EP 2 593 025 B1

Jurisdictions

UPC

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 274.1 RoP, Rule 275.1 RoP, Rule 275.2 RoP, Rule 275.4 RoP, Art. 95 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field