Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Duesseldorf Local Division » LD Düsseldorf, August 04, 2026, Confirmation by the Court of a settlement, UPC_CFI_1536/2026

LD Düsseldorf, August 04, 2026, Confirmation by the Court of a settlement, UPC_CFI_1536/2026

Saskia Mertsching

1 min Reading time

Key takeaways

A confirmation by the Court of a settlement can be enforced as a decision of the Court.

✓

This follows from R. 365(1)S.1 RoP. Where applicable, the settlement agreement will be entered in the Register in redacted form only.

Division

LD Düsseldorf

UPC number

UPC_CFI_1536/2026

Type of proceedings

Confirmation by the Court of a settlement

Parties

Applicant: OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH

Respondent: ANCA Europe GmbH

Patent(s)

EP 2 983 864

Body of legislation / Rules

R. 365(1) S. 2 RoP

LD DUS_2026-08-04_UPC_CFI_1536-2026_OTEC-Praezisionsfinish-v-ANCA-Europe_EP2983864Download

Was the article helpful?

Categories

Tags

More exciting articles on similar topics

Content not to be missed

  • Duesseldorf Local Division, Local Division

    LD Düsseldorf, October 2, 2026, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_2660/2026

    Alternative service may be authorized under Rule 275.1 RoP upon establishing good reason when standard service under Rules 270 to 274 RoP proves impossible.: Where regular postal delivery under Rule 271.4(a) RoP fails at the registered seat, documents remain uncollected at a postal depot, and the defendant’s known representative declines consensual service, standard service is …
    →
  • Duesseldorf Local Division

    LD Duesseldorf, October 6, 2026, Decision, UPC_CFI_137/2025, UPC_CFI_512/2025

    Under Rule 171(2) RoP, a defendant is not required to provide counter-measurements if the claimant’s initial measurements regarding a claim feature are inherently unconvincing and inconclusive✓ Where the claimant’s experimental data fails to isolate the alleged buffering effect from the geometry of multiple casing inlets, the proof remains inconclusive on its face. In such circumstances, …
    →
  • Duesseldorf Local Division

    LD Düsseldorf, September 2, 2026, decision, UPC_CFI_297/2025, UPC_CFI_651/2025

    The Düsseldorf Local Division partially upheld the patent-in-suit, which relates to “SHARING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT IN A PEER-TO-PEER CONFIGURATION”, and found that the patent in its upheld version was indirectly infringed by the Disney+ streaming service. The decision focusses on claim construction, validity and some procedural aspects, applying the UPC’s established case law, for example regarding …
    →

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field