Key takeaways
UPC sets strict limitations on requests for filing further briefs
✓
The UPC emphasizes procedural efficiency and limits deviations from the standard briefing schedule outlined in Rule 12 RoP. Requests for further briefs must be explicitly justified and supported by specific evidence, outlining the necessity for exceeding the standard two mandatory and two optional briefs.
Request for filing further briefs requires detailed justification
✓
Vague assertions of new arguments are insufficient to justify a further brief under Rules 12.5 and 36 RoP. The requesting party must pinpoint specific paragraphs in prior briefs where new issues arise and provide a substantiated explanation for why a further brief is necessary.
Division
LD Mannheim
UPC number
UPC_CFI_132/2024
Type of proceedings
infringement action
Parties
Applicant: Total Semiconductor, LLC
Respondent(s):
- Texas Instruments Incorporation
- Texas Instruments Deutschland GmbH
- Texas Instruments EMEA Sales GmbH
Patent(s)
EP 2 746 957
Jurisdictions
UPC
Body of legislation / Rules
Rule 12 RoP, Rule 12.5 RoP, Rule 36 RoP
