Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » LD Munich, 12 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_54/2024

LD Munich, 12 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_54/2024

Philipp Bovenkamp

1 min Reading time

Table of Contents

  1. Key takeaways
  2. Division
  3. UPC number
  4. Type of proceedings
  5. Parties
  6. Patent(s)
  7. Body of legislation / Rules

Key takeaways

Change of language of proceedings upon (unobjected) request

✓

In the absence of an objection from the opposing party, the language of the proceedings shall be changed from German to English, i.e. the language in which the patent at issue has been granted.

There was no request that existing pleadings and other documents should be translated.

Division

Local Division Munich

UPC number

UPC_CFI_54/2024

Type of proceedings

Infringement action

Parties

Claimant: Headwater Research LLC (Tyler, TX, USA)

Defendant:

  • Samsung Electronics GmbH (Schalbach/Taunus, DE)
  • Samsung Electronics France, S.A.S. (Saint-Ouen-Sur-Seine, FR)
  • Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (Suwon, KR)

Patent(s)

EP 2 391 947

Body of legislation / Rules

R. 323 RoP

2024-06-12-LD MUC_UPC_CFI_54_2024Download

Was the article helpful?

Categories

Tags

More exciting articles on similar topics

Content not to be missed

  • Munich Local Division

    LD Munich, March 11, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_201/2024

    Timely lodging of statement of claim upon order of provisional measures: payment of court fees relevant (not timing of receipt): The applicant of provisional measures has to “start proceedings on the merits” of the case within 31 calendar days (or 20 working days, whichever is longer) from the date specified in the Court’s order (R. …
    →
  • Mannheim Local Division

    LD Mannheim, March 11, 2025, orders, UPC_CFI_159/2024, UPC_CFI_162/2024

    If infringement proceedings are ready for decision with regard to single national parts, decision should not be withheld if this would delay enforcement: This decision has gained relevance in light of the recent decisions on the long-arm jurisdiction (cf. CJEU, BSH v Electrolux (C-339/22); UPC LD Dusseldorf, Fujifilm v Kodak (UPC_CFI_355/2023) according to which the …
    →
  • Duesseldorf Local Division

    LD Düsseldorf, March 4, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_468/2024, UPC_CFI_687/2024

    Referral of Counterclaim for Revocation (Art. 33(3)(b) UPCA, R. 37.2 RoP): The Local Division Düsseldorf referred the counterclaim for revocation to the Central Division in Milan. The Parties had unanimously requested the, and requests by all parties will be granted unless strongcounterarguments require a different decision (UPC_CFI 14/2023 (LD Munich), Order of 2 February2024 – …
    →

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field