Key takeaways
Requirements for discretionary review pursuant to R. 220.3 RoP
When deciding whether to allow a discretionary review, the Court of Appeal must consider whether the impugned order of the Court of First Instance is manifestly erroneous and whether the impugned order raises a fundamental question of law and its review is necessary to ensure a consistent application and interpretation of the Rules of Procedure or any other objective of the discretionary review (CoA, UPC_CoA_489/2024, order of 6 September 2024, Motorola v. Ericsson, para. 4; UPC_CoA_805/2025, order of 1 September 2025, Centripetal v. Keysight, paras. 8 and 11)
Division
Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court
UPC number
UPC-CoA-67/2026
Type of proceedings
Infringement proceedings; discretionary review
Parties
Applicant (Claimant in the main proceedings): Advanced Standard Communication LLC
Respondents (Defendants in the main proceedings):
- XIAOMI Inc.
- XIAOMI Communications Co., Ltd.
- XIAOMI Technology Netherlands B.V.
- XIAOMI Technology Germany GmbH,
Patent(s)
EP 3 016 464
Jurisdictions
UPC
Body of legislation / Rules
R. 220.3 RoP
