Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Munich Local Division » LD Munich, 28 August 2023, procedural order, UPC_CFI_249/2023

LD Munich, 28 August 2023, procedural order, UPC_CFI_249/2023

Sebastian Müller

1 min Reading time

Table of Contents

  1. Key takeaways
  2. Division
  3. UPC number
  4. Type of proceedings
  5. Parties
  6. Patent(s)
  7. Body of legislation / Rules

Key takeaways

Application of Rules 109.3 RoP and 112.3.(c) RoP

✓

LD Munich ordered that simultaneous interpretation into English shall be provided for the panel during oral hearing and that the simultaneous translator is involved by videoconference.

Division

Local Division Munich

UPC number

UPC_CFI_249/2023

Type of proceedings

Request for provisional measures – Procedural Order

Parties

Applicant:

  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

Respondents:

  • Meril GmbH
  • Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.

Patent(s)

EP 3 763 331 B1

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 109.3 RoP, Rule 112.3.(c) RoP

2023-08-28-ld-munich-upc_cfi_249-2023-ord_567601-2023-app_50921-2023-ladung-anonymizedDownload

Was the article helpful?

Categories

Tags

  • German and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative, Senior Associate

  • Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwalt), UPC Representative, Partner

More exciting articles on similar topics

Content not to be missed

  • Munich Local Division

    LD Munich, March 11, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_201/2024

    Timely lodging of statement of claim upon order of provisional measures: payment of court fees relevant (not timing of receipt): The applicant of provisional measures has to “start proceedings on the merits” of the case within 31 calendar days (or 20 working days, whichever is longer) from the date specified in the Court’s order (R. …
    →
  • Munich Local Division

    LD Munich, February 28, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_483/2024

    Amendment of case (Rule 263 RoP): The claimant sought to amend the case to include the Netherlands after the patent was restored there. The application was made under Rule 263 of the Rules of Procedure (RoP) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Reasonable Diligence Requirement (Rule 263.2(a) RoP) : The claimant failed to demonstrate reasonable …
    →
  • Munich Local Division

    LD Munich, February 24, 2025, decision regarding award of costs, UPC_CFI_2/2023

    In PI-proceedings an application for the determination of costs pursuant to R. 151 RoP is admissible in the event that the Court of Appeal has issued a basic decision on costs pursuant to R. 242.1RoP.: Pursuant to R. 150.1 RoP, the determination of costs may be the subject of separate proceedings following a decision on …
    →

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field