Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Paris Local Division » LD Paris, February 4, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_583/2025

LD Paris, February 4, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_583/2025

4 min Reading time

Key takeaways

The claimant must specify evidence within the defendant’s control. The Court’s order is subject to safeguards for confidential information and the right against self-incrimination (Art. 59(1) UPCA).

The claimant met this standard by providing older technical data sheets, composition analyses, and a product sample, which the Court deemed sufficient to render the infringement allegations plausible.

The Court ordered production exclusively through the CMS, setting a deadline of two weeks from the issuance of the order, not its service.

The Court found a daily penalty payment unjustified at this stage but explicitly reserved the right to draw conclusions from the defendant’s failure to comply with the decision.

The Court deemed R. 36 RoP inapplicable at the evidence production stage but confirmed that parties can naturally

Division

LD Paris

UPC number

UPC_CFI_583/2025

Type of proceedings

Main infringement action

Parties

Claimant: Bostik, Inc.

Defendants: Henkel France; Henkel France Operations; Henkel Technologies France; Henkel AG & Co. KGaA; Henkel Nederland B.V.; Henkel Italia S.r.l.

Patent(s)

EP 1725627 B1

Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

Body of legislation / Rules

Art. 59 UPCA
Art. 73(2)(a) UPCA
R. 4.1 RoP
R. 36 RoP
R. 190 RoP
R. 220.1(c) RoP
R. 224.1(b) RoP


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field