Topics: Counterclaim for revocation
-
CD Paris, 27 February 2024, order on request to amend the patent, UPC_CFI_255/2023
Request to further “amend the case” or “amend the patent” by defendant in revocation action due to invalidity attacks brought in the parallel counterclaim for revocation was rejected: Defendant in revocation action applied to amend the patent in due time, i.e, within the time period for lodging the defence to revocation. It then requested a…
6 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, 15 February 2024, R.9 Order on the Application of Art. 33(3) UPCA, UPC_CFI_239/2023
No bifurcation of infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (as unanimously requested by the parties): A joint hearing of the infringement action and the counterclaim seems to be appropriate in particular for reasons of procedural expediency and avoids the risk of delay that might be involved with bifurcating. It is also preferable because it allows…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD The Hague, February 15, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_239/2023
1. Decision against bifurcation before closure of written procedure: The Local Division The Hague decided to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA) and not to bifurcate. This desicsion was taken before the closure of the written procedure (R. 37.2 RoP) for practical reasons. The decision was in conformity…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, 27 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_22/2023
The time period for responding to a counterclaim for revocation and the time period for the reply to the statement of defense should run in parallel: In a case in which the statement of defense includes trade secrets but the counterclaim for revocation does not, and in which access to an unredacted version of the…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.