Home » R. 263.2 RoP

Topics: R. 263.2 RoP

Published: March 7, 2025

Munich Local Division

LD Munich, February 28, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_483/2024

Amendment of case (Rule 263 RoP): The claimant sought to amend the case to include the Netherlands after the patent was restored there. The application was made under Rule 263 of the Rules of Procedure (RoP) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Reasonable Diligence Requirement (Rule 263.2(a) RoP) : The claimant failed to demonstrate reasonable…

3 min Reading time

→
Contact us personally!

Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.

Make an inquiry now

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Yes, I consent to the collection, processing and use of my above-mentioned personal data for the purposes of processing my message and for the purposes of contacting me via email. The legal basis of the processing shall be formed by my consent pursuant to Art. 6 (1) lit. a GDPR. The data will be deleted three months after expiry of the purpose, provided that longer retention periods are not required by law. I can revoke this consent with future effect at any time. I have taken note of the privacy statement and consent to it. With regard to the processing of my data, I am entitled to inalienable rights, information on which can be found in the privacy statement.

* = Required field

Topics: R. 263.2 RoP

LD Munich, February 28, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_483/2024

Contact us personally!

Stay in the loop

LD Munich, March 11, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_201/2024

LD Mannheim, March 11, 2025, orders, UPC_CFI_159/2024, UPC_CFI_162/2024

LD Düsseldorf, March 4, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_468/2024, UPC_CFI_687/2024

LD Mannheim, March 11, 2025, decisions, UPC_CFI_159/2024, UPC_CFI_162/2024

LD Duesseldorf, March 7, 2025, Decision of Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_459/2023