Topics: R. 334 RoP
-
LD Paris, February 12, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_425/2023
In case of multiple defendants in an infringement action, it is reasonable for the Judge-Rapporteur to extend the deadline for filing of a Statement of Defence to align the deadlines for all defendants: In the present case, service of the Statement of Claim was delayed for one of the three defendants. According to Rule 23…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, February 12, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_395/2023
In case of multiple defendants in an infringement action, it is reasonable for the Judge-Rapporteur to extend the deadline for filing of a Statement of Defence to align the deadlines for all defendants: In the present case, service of the Statement of Claim was delayed for some of the fourteen defendants. According to Rule 23…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Munich, May 27, 2024, Order on request to extend and to shorten a deadline, UPC_CFI_498/2023
It is a reason for a term extension if wrong exhibits to which reference is made in the Statement of claim have been made available via the CMS: According to case law of the Court of Appeals (UPC-CoA_320/2023; APFL_572929/2023) it is sufficient for an extension of the terms for lodging the Statement of Defense, if…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 19 February 2024, order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_9/2023
Example of exercise of the case management powers of the court under R. 334 RoP.: A videoconference with the parties can be designated a separate hearing under Rule 334(d) RoP, which does not preclude an interim conference under Rule 35(b) RoP. Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_9/2023 Type of proceedings Infringement Action Parties Claimant:…
1 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.