Home » UPC decisions » Central Division » CD Paris, July 28, 2025, decision in revocation action, UPC_CFI_239/2024

CD Paris, July 28, 2025, decision in revocation action, UPC_CFI_239/2024

2 min Reading time

Key takeaways

While terms used in patent documents should be given their normal meaning in the relevant art, the description and the drawings, when considered in the context of document’s contents and not in isolation, may give these terms a different meaning.

In the case at hand, the Court affirmed, applying this principle, that according to the ordinary meaning of the wording in common language, as well as in the context of the description and drawings of the patent, the term “a working surface” was to be interpreted as meaning “one working surface”.

Division

CD Paris

UPC number

UPC_CFI_239/2024

Type of proceedings

Revocation Action

Parties

Claimant: Anonymous

Defendant: Essetre Holding spa

Patent(s)

EP 2 875 923 B1

Body of legislation / Rules


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field