Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » LD Duesseldorf, September 12, 2025, procedural order on further exchanges of written pleadings, UPC_CFI_733/2024

LD Duesseldorf, September 12, 2025, procedural order on further exchanges of written pleadings, UPC_CFI_733/2024

2 min Reading time

Key takeaways

The correct means to introduce written pleadings outside the regime provided for in the Rules of Procedure is an application pursuant to R. 36 RoP. Such an application must be made prior to the date on which the judge-rapporteur intends to conclude the written procedure. If a written pleading mixes points for which further submissions are foreseen by the Rules of procedure with points for which no further submissions are foreseen may result in non-consideration of the latter.

Even if the claimant, in view of an objection raised by the defendant for the first time in its response to the infringement action, only had one opportunity to comment on this in writing, in the reply, this circumstance does not automatically require the admission of a further written statement. The claimant must explain which specific arguments of the defendant, in its view, necessitate a further written statement.

Division

Duesseldorf local division

UPC number

UPC_CFI_733/2024, UPC_CFI_255/2025

Type of proceedings

Infringement proceedings

Parties

TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE (claimant)

IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG (defendant)

Patent(s)

EP 2 624 031

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 36 RoP, Rule 9.2 RoP


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

  • Attorney-at-law (Rechtsanwältin), UPC Representative, Counsel

  • Dr. Anna Giedke, Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwältin), UPC Representative, Partner at BARDEHLE PAGENBERG

    Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwältin), UPC Representative, Partner

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field