Institutions: Local Division
-
LD Mannheim, 13 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_219/2023
Extension of time limit (only) for response to redacted FRAND submission: Claimant filed its reply brief with heavy redactions re. the FRAND part. Hence, upon Defendant’s request the deadline for filing its rejoinder brief was extended as it relates to these redactions. However, as the parts re. infringement and validity of the patent were not…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 12 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_54/2024
Change of language of proceedings upon (unobjected) request: In the absence of an objection from the opposing party, the language of the proceedings shall be changed from German to English, i.e. the language in which the patent at issue has been granted. There was no request that existing pleadings and other documents should be translated.…
1 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Hamburg, 4 June 2024, Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_54/2023
In relation to the proprietor of a European patent there is a rebuttable presumption pursuant to R. 5(a) and (c) that the person shown in the patent register is the actual proprietor of the patent: Nevertheless, the person shown in the register can be ordered to produce evidence according to R. 190 RoP in order…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, May 27, 2024, Order on request to extend and to shorten a deadline, UPC_CFI_498/2023
It is a reason for a term extension if wrong exhibits to which reference is made in the Statement of claim have been made available via the CMS: According to case law of the Court of Appeals (UPC-CoA_320/2023; APFL_572929/2023) it is sufficient for an extension of the terms for lodging the Statement of Defense, if…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, May 30, 2024, order pursuant R. 323 RoP, UPC_CFI_26/2024
In infringement proceedings, the position of the defendant requesting the language of the proceedings to be changed into the language of the patent is decisive, if in the overall assessment the result of the balancing of interest is the same: Art. 49.5 UPCA must be interpreted in such a way that the decision on whether…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, May 21, 2024, order concerning security for legal costs, UPC_CFI_495/2023
Claimant’s financial situation is decisive when deciding on security for legal costs: The criterion of the Claimant’s financial situation is decisive for the Court when it has to decide whether or not to order a security for the legal costs. The Applicants (Defendants in the main proceedings) submitted that there are no public records about…
6 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan, May 14, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_241/2023
The parties must submit a summary of the topics to be dealt with during the interim conference prior to the interim conference: The parties must inform the Court in advance of the interim conference which persons will participate in the interim conference: With exception of confidential information, the interim conference is open to the public:…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, May 14, 2024, order, UPC_CFI_151/2024
Security for costs in the proceedings for provisional measures: Art. 69.4 UPCA explicitly refers to proceedings for the application of provisional measures pursuant to Art. 62 UPCA. R. 158 RoP is thus also applicable in the proceedings for provisional measures. The request for a security for costs is in line with the EU law and…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, May 14, 2024, Request for leave to change claim, UPC_CFI_457/2023
The concretization of the claims by the claimant is not a mere clarification, but a subsequent unconditional and therefore always admissible limitation/change of the claim within the meaning of R. 263 (3) RoP: According to the wording of the statement of claim, the action was initially directed against all computers and electronic end devices of…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, May 16, 2024, order re. producing license agreements, UPC_CFI_216/2023
The order to produce license agreements could be inappropriate if the alleged infringer was unwilling to take a license from the beginning: Scope of the order to produce license agreements in view of the SEP holder’s duty of transparency established by the ECJ: In the present case, the claimant already submitted few comparable license agreements.…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, April 30, 2024, Order on provisional measures, UPC_CFI_463/2023
Rebuttable presumption that the person registered as the patent proprietor is entitled to be registered pursuant to R. 8.5 (c) RoP: If in the case of a European patent a person is registered as the patent proprietor in the respective national register, there is a rebuttable presumption that the person recorded in the respective national…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris – May 6, 2024 – UPC_CFI_440/2023 – procedural order
An intervener may not develop claims contrary to those of the party it supports, and may not autonomously develop claims and procedural modalities distinct from those offered to the party it supports.: Consequently, an intervener that has not filed a counterclaim for invalidity within the time limit set for the party they support cannot claim…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan – May 6, 2024 – UPC_CFI_241/2023 – confidentiality order
Request under Rule 262A RoP for a confidentiality order regarding financial information granted. Attorneys only. : Request under R. 262A RoP by plaintif for a confidentiality order granted regarding financialinformation provided pursuant to court order and pursuant to Rule 104(k) RoP. Access to confidential information is restricted to attorneys only, with the consent of the…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, May 1, 2024, UPC_CFI_379/2023, Procedural order
Withdrawal of action pursuant to R. 265 RoP and reimbursement of court fees: An application to withdraw shall be permitted if the other party consents to the withdrawal. The Court then issues a decision declaring the proceedings closed, resp. the case terminated. The decision includes a decision on costs and the decision will be published…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, April 30, 2024, Order re producing license agreements, UPC_CFI_ 218/2023, UPC_CFI_ 219/2023, UPC_CFI_ 223/2023,
Plaintiff in infringement proceedings can request an order, directed against themselves, to produce an SEP license agreement with a third party. In accordance with the principle of production of evidence (Art. 43 UPCA), the plaintiff must decide for themselves which submissions they wish to make in the proceedings.: In order to demonstrate that FRAND obligations…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, May 06, 2024, Order on separation of proceedings, UPC_CFI_ 218/2023, UPC_CFI_219/2023 und UPC_CFI_223/2023
Pursuant to R. 303.2 RoP, the court may order that proceedings initiated in relation to several defendants be heard in separate proceedings if such separation is appropriate and necessary.: If, in proceedings with several defendants, representatives have only been appointed for some of the defendants and the remaining defendants have yet to be served and…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, April 18, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_169/2024
All service outside the contracting member states is covered by section 2, i.e. Rules 273 and 274 RoP.: If defendants are domiciled outside the territory of the contracting member states of the UPCA and have no statutory seat, central administration or principal place of business nor their own permanent or temporary place of business within…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.