Home » UPC decisions » Luxembourg Court of Appeal » Court of Appeal, October 2, 2025, decision, UPC_CoA_764/2024, 774/2024

Court of Appeal, October 2, 2025, decision, UPC_CoA_764/2024, 774/2024

2 min Reading time

Key takeaways

Whether the subject matter of the granted claim extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed is determined by considering what information a person skilled in the art, based on objective considerations and referring to the filing date and using its general technical knowledge, would directly and unambiguously derive from the entirety of the application as filed. This includes implicitly disclosed subject matter that follows clearly and unambiguously from what is expressly mentioned.

In case of a divisional application, the added matter standard applies to each earlier application. The subject matter of the granted claim must not extend beyond (1) the disclosure of the originally filed application for the patent AND (2) the disclosure of the original PCT application.

Division

Court of Appeal

UPC number

UPC_CoA_764/2024, UPC_CoA_774/2024

Type of proceedings

Appeal decision (1st instance proceedings: LD Düsseldorf, decision of October 10, 2024, UPC_CFI_363/2023)

Parties

expert e-Commerce GmbH, expert klein GmbH (appellants / defendants in 1st instance infringement proceedings)

Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (respondent / claimant in 1st instance infringement proceedings)

Patent(s)

EP 3 926 698

Jurisdictions

UPC, Court of Appeal, Luxembourg


Was the article helpful?


Categories


Tags

  • Nobuchika Mamine, Attorney-at-Law (Rechtsanwalt), Certified IP Lawyer, UPC Representative, Senior Associate at BARDEHLE PAGENBERG

    Attorney-at-law (Rechtsanwalt), Certified IP Lawyer, UPC Representative

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field