Author: Tobias Wuttke
-
UPC monthly report 02/2024
When analyzing the UPC filing statistics of February 2024, two things become readily apparent: 1) New infringement actions and application for provisional measures (= preliminary injunctions) are coming in on a regular basis and a total of 274 cases are pending. The Munich Local Division is expanding its lead position. Currently, 36 infringement actions and…
-
UPC monthly report 01/2024
German remains the predominant language of proceedings with 47 percent. However, English is catching up – for the time being 43 percent – and this trend will likely continue over the next months.
-
The State of Play at the UPC from a Japanese Perspective: Insights from Active UPC Litigators
Join three active UPC litigators involved in over 30 UPC actions to discuss what these developments mean from a Japanese perspective and how Japanese companies can adjust and complement their enforcement and defense strategies in light of the emerging legal framework.
-
IP Experts LIVE: UPC vs. national and supra-national courts – strategy review
For both plaintiffs and defendants, it is critical to understand the interplay of UPC and national court proceedings and the strategic options it provides. When the Unified Patent Court has operated one month, our attorneys Johannes Heselberger and Dr. Tobias Wuttke reviewed relevant strategic considerations.
-
Untangling the UPC: What in-house patent experts need to know now
JUVE PATENT and BARDEHLE PAGENBERG invited in-house IP counsel and expert guests from selected tech firms to an informal in-house IP networking event. The Unified Patent Court opened for business on 1 June; 20 days in, we wanted to reflect on this historic milestone and explore what the future will bring. The first few months of…
-
LD Munich, 19 September 2023, decision and orders on preliminary measures, UPC_CFI_2/2023
Rule 206 RoP only defines formal requirements: The requirements of Rule 206 RoP only need to be formally presented. If any requirement is missing materially, this does not lead to inadmissibility of the request for provisional measures. The material assessement is governed by Rule 211.2 RoP. Rule 206.2(e) RoP does not apply to requests for…