Home » UPC decisions » Local Division » Milan Local Division » LD Milan, 13 June 2023, decision, UPC_CFI_141/2023

LD Milan, 13 June 2023, decision, UPC_CFI_141/2023

Maggie Huang

1 min Reading time

Table of Contents

  1. Key takeaways
  2. Division
  3. UPC case number
  4. Order reference
  5. Type of proceedings
  6. Parties
  7. Patent
  8. Jurisdictions
  9. Body of legislation / Rules

Download decision(s) (PDF)

Key takeaways

This is a parallel application filed by the same party against another party during the trade fair ITMA

✓

For details, see the post https://upc.law/?post_type=decisions&p=3120

Division

Local Division Milan

UPC case number

UPC_CFI_141/2023

Order reference

ORD_500982/2023

Type of proceedings

Application for preserving evidence

Parties

Claimant: OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO KG

Defendant: BHAGAT GROUP

Patent

EP2145848

Jurisdictions

Italy

Body of legislation / Rules

  • Rule 192 RoP
  • Rule 194.3 RoP
  • Rule 196.4 RoP
  • Rule 197 RoP
  • Article 32(1)(c) UPCA
  • Article 33(1)(a) UPCA
  • Article 60(1) UPCA
23-06-14-ld-milan-decision-preserving-evidence-500982_2023-upc_cfi_141_2023-anonymizedDownload

Was the article helpful?

Categories

Tags

  • German and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative, Senior Associate

More exciting articles on similar topics

Content not to be missed

  • Milan Local Division

    LD Milan, February 7, 2025, procedural order, UPC_CFI_472/2024

    The position of the party attacking the patent shall be protected to the same extent as that of the party defending the patent.: If the mandatory coordination between the appeals proceedings before the EPO and the proceedings before the UPC may be achieved in the most efficient way by extending the time limits for filing …
    →
  • Milan Local Division

    LD Milan, January 15, 2025, procedural order, UPC_CFI_472/2024

    The court may set deadlines to await an upcoming appeals decision of the EPO: The coordination between the appeal proceedings before the EPO and the proceedings before UPC may be achieved in the most efficient way taking into account the position of all parties, for instance by extending the time limits for filing the statement …
    →
  • Local Division, Milan Local Division

    LD Milan, November 22, 2024, Application for provisional measures, UPC_CFI_400/2024

    Examination of the application for provisional measures: In proceedings for provisional measures, the Applicant is required to provide cumulatively reasonable evidence to satisfy the Court with a sufficient degree of certainty that: (i) the Applicant is entitled to initiate proceedings under Art. 47 UPCA; (ii) the patent is valid; (iii) its rights are being infringed …
    →

Stay in the loop

Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.

* = Required field