Topics: Application for preserving evidence
-
LD Düsseldorf, May 4, 2026, revocation of an order on inspection and evidence preservation, UPC_CFI_885/2025
An order for the preservation of evidence shall be revoked or otherwise cease to have effect if the applicant does not start proceedings on the merits before the court within a period of 31 calendar days or 20 working days from the date specified in the court order (release of expert description). To remedy the…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, Order, December 19, 2025, UPC_CFI_1598_2025, UPC_CFI_1600_2025
No CMS Access, No Say on Confidentiality: The Düsseldorf Local Division clarified the consequences for a defendant who fails to engage with the UPC’s Case Management System (CMS) following an order to preserve evidence. The applicant obtained an ex parte order to preserve evidence, which was executed at the defendant’s booth at the MEDICA trade…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
CoA, July 15, 2025, review of orders to preserve evidence, UPC_CoA_327/2025, UPC_CoA_002/2025
A request for preserving evidence does not require that this measure is sought without unreasonable delay. : It is necessary to distinguish between the assessment of urgency in the context of an application for preserving evidence (R. 194.2(a) RoP) and the assessment of urgency in the context of an application for provisional measures (R. 209.2(b)…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan, 13 June 2023, decision, UPC_CFI_141/2023
This is a parallel application filed by the same party against another party during the trade fair ITMA: For details, see the post https://upc.law/?post_type=decisions&p=3120 Division Local Division Milan UPC case number UPC_CFI_141/2023 Order reference ORD_500982/2023 Type of proceedings Application for preserving evidence Parties Claimant: OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO KG Defendant: BHAGAT GROUP Patent EP2145848…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan, 13 June 13 2023, decision, UPC_CFI_127/2023
: The conditions referred to in Rule 197.1 RoP and Article 60(5) UPCA, for the granting of the measure without the prior hearing of the defendant, are: The tight deadlines do not allow the parties to be convened before the end of the fair tomorrow; There is a risk that the evidence will no longer…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan, 13 June 2023, order by the standing judge, UPC_CFI_127/2023
Extreme urgency not found by standing judge, and proceedings forwarded to the presiding judge: By virtue of Rule194.4 RoP, the standing judge, appointed in accordance with Rule 345.5 RoP, in cases of extreme urgency may decide immediately on an application to preserve evidence and on the procedure to be followed. In the case at hand,…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.