Institutions: Local Division
-
LD Düsseldorf, February 26, 2024, order on language of the proceedings, UPC_CFI_463/2023
For a decision according to Art. 49 UPCA it may be sufficient that the initially chosen language is significantly detrimental to the Applicant. A disproportionate disadvantage is not necessary: The decision has to take grounds of fairness and all relevant circumstances into account, Art. 49(5) UPCA. Decisive are the respective interests at stake. Assertions of…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, February 16, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_463/2023
A party has to substantiate why specific persons should receive access to confidential information according to R. 262A RoP: According to R. 262A.6 RoP, the number of persons receiving access to confidential information of the other party shall be no greater than necessary. This does not necessarily include the entire team of lawyers and other…
1 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD The Hague, February 15, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_239/2023
1. Decision against bifurcation before closure of written procedure: The Local Division The Hague decided to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA) and not to bifurcate. This desicsion was taken before the closure of the written procedure (R. 37.2 RoP) for practical reasons. The decision was in conformity…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD, The Hague, February 13, 2024, Order, UPC_CFI_239/2023LD
Each party must bear its own legal costs until a final decision and cost order is made: Even if both parties are start-ups or SMEs, both parties have a limited cash-flow, are competitors of each other and the claimant has limited financial capacities, each party must bear its own legal costs until a final decision…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, February 14, 2024, order on confidentiality measures, UPC_CFI_463/2023
CMS provides for graduated procedure for protection of confidential information : With(in) the R. 262A workflow, the UPC Case Management System (CMS) provides for a step-by-step procedure for the protection of confidential information, comprehensively taking into account the interests of both parties in confidentiality. : Before the unredacted version of a document submitted with an…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, 25 January 2024, decision, UPC_CFI_559935/2023
Background: The plaintiff filed a claim for damages subsequent to a German patent infringement case in which the defendant had been found to infringe the German part of EP 1 740 740 B1. The defendant objected to the jurisdiction of the court regarding the damages claim. This objection was allowed by the judge-rapporteur, as per…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 30 January 2024, procedural order (review R.333), UPC_CFI_230/2023
Amount of fine in the event of a breach of a confidentiality order: The decision relates to a review according to Rule 333 RoP of point 6.) of a confidentiallity order issued by the judge rapporteur on 19 December 2023. It emphasized that while the Paris and Munich orders pertain to the same protected confidential…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 5 February 2024, decision UPC_CFI_498/2023
Electronic service of the statement of claim: Rule 275 RoP does not permit the court to designate someone as person authorised to accept service, if that person has not notified the Registry or the claimant to be willing to accept service of the statement of claim on behalf of the defendant at an electronic address…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 24 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_230/2023
Review Procedure comes before Appeal Process: Case management decisions must first be reviewed by the panel under Rule 333 RoP before they can be appealed under Rule 220 RoP (cf. UPC Court of Appeal (n°486/2023, §6). Consequently, if the review under Rule 333 RoP of a confidentiality order is still pending, a request for leave…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, 25 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_452/2023
Assessment of validity of the patent in proceedings for provisional measures : In proceedings for provisional measures, the panel must assess, based on the submissions of the parties, whether the validity challenges raise reasonable doubts about the validity of the asserted patent, Article 62(4) of the UPCA in conjunction with Rule 211.2 of the Rules…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Düsseldorf, 24 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_452/2023
CMS workflow for the request under R. 212.3 RoP: In order to ensure that the proceedings run as seamlessly as possible, the CMS provides for a separate workflow for the submission of a request to review in accordance with R. 212.3 RoP. The panel may grant a party the right to re-file a request filed…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 23 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_181/2023
The interim conference can be held as video conference : The recording of the interim conference can be listened to on the premises of the Munich Local Division. Potential orders in the interim conference: Potential orders in the interim conference include the determination of deadlines for further written submissions by the parties, the determination of…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, 29 January 2024, UPC_CFI_463/2023
Assessment of validity of the patent in proceedings for provisional measures : In proceedings for provisional measures, the panel must assess, based on the submissions of the parties, whether the validity challenges raise reasonable doubts about the validity of the asserted patent, Article 62(4) of the UPCA in conjunction with Rule 211.2 of the Rules…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, January 19, 2024 order on extension of time limits, UPC_CFI_457/2023
Extension of time limits: Insofar as R. 9.3 (a) of the Rules of Procedure grants the possibility of extending the time limit for filing an opposition and a statement of defense, this is only to be used in justified exceptional cases. Such an exceptional case was found here, since of the 15 defendants, most of…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, 27 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_22/2023
The time period for responding to a counterclaim for revocation and the time period for the reply to the statement of defense should run in parallel: In a case in which the statement of defense includes trade secrets but the counterclaim for revocation does not, and in which access to an unredacted version of the…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, 20 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_363/2023
Term extensions are an exception: Insofar as R. 9.3 (a) RoP provides for the possibility of extending time periods, this should only be used with caution and only in justified exceptional cases against the background of the strict time limit regime set out in the Rules, which serves to ensure that proceedings are conducted as…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, 16 January 2024, Order of the President of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_373/2023
A defendant seeking a change in the language of the proceedings does not need to wait for the submission of the statement of defense before lodging a motion for a change of the language: R. 321.1 RoP and R. 322 RoP do not preclude the admissibility of an application to use the language in which…
4 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.