Institutions: Paris Local Division
- Brussels Local Division
- Central Division
- Duesseldorf Local Division
- Hamburg Local Division
- Helsinki Local Division
- Lisbon Local Division
- Local Division
- Luxembourg Court of Appeal
- Mannheim Local Division
- Milan Central Division
- Milan Local Division
- Munich Central Division
- Munich Local Division
- Nordic-Baltic Regional Division
- Paris Central Division
- Paris Local Division
- President of Court of First Instance
- Regional Division
- The Hague Local Division
- Vienna Local Division
-
LD Paris, May 21, 2024, order concerning security for legal costs, UPC_CFI_495/2023
Claimant’s financial situation is decisive when deciding on security for legal costs: The criterion of the Claimant’s financial situation is decisive for the Court when it has to decide whether or not to order a security for the legal costs. The Applicants (Defendants in the main proceedings) submitted that there are no public records about…
6 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris – May 6, 2024 – UPC_CFI_440/2023 – procedural order
An intervener may not develop claims contrary to those of the party it supports, and may not autonomously develop claims and procedural modalities distinct from those offered to the party it supports.: Consequently, an intervener that has not filed a counterclaim for invalidity within the time limit set for the party they support cannot claim…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Paris, March 26, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_397/2023
Waiver of Rule 262A RoP: Even though Rule 262A RoP provides that the confidentiality club shall include at least one natural person from each party, the Court considers that it is possible for the parties to exclude access by a natural person by mutual agreement, provided that the principle of a fair trial is not…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, February 12, 2024, procedural order re. alternative method of service, UPC_CFI_495/2023
Requirements for alternative methods of service: If digital tracking provided by the post office shows that delivery of the Statement of claim (SoC) initiated by the Court could not be carried out, alternative methods of service are possible, R. 275.1 RoP. In the present case, Claimant subsequently suggested three methods of service that appeared to…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 12 February 2024, procedural order on an application for forced intervention, UPC_CFI_440/2023
A defendant, who has a warranty claim against its supplier, can successfully apply for forced intervention of the supplier under R. 316A.1 RoP: SAS LASER COMPONENTS sougth the forced intervention of PHOTON WAVE Co. Ltd, which it designates as the supplier of the allegedly infringing UV LED chips, claiming that if it were to be…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 30 January 2024, procedural order (review R.333), UPC_CFI_230/2023
Amount of fine in the event of a breach of a confidentiality order: The decision relates to a review according to Rule 333 RoP of point 6.) of a confidentiallity order issued by the judge rapporteur on 19 December 2023. It emphasized that while the Paris and Munich orders pertain to the same protected confidential…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 24 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_230/2023
Review Procedure comes before Appeal Process: Case management decisions must first be reviewed by the panel under Rule 333 RoP before they can be appealed under Rule 220 RoP (cf. UPC Court of Appeal (n°486/2023, §6). Consequently, if the review under Rule 333 RoP of a confidentiality order is still pending, a request for leave…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.