Institutions: Mannheim Local Division
- Brussels Local Division
- Central Division
- Duesseldorf Local Division
- Hamburg Local Division
- Helsinki Local Division
- Lisbon Local Division
- Local Division
- Luxembourg Court of Appeal
- Mannheim Local Division
- Milan Central Division
- Milan Local Division
- Munich Central Division
- Munich Local Division
- Nordic-Baltic Regional Division
- Paris Central Division
- Paris Local Division
- President of Court of First Instance
- Regional Division
- The Hague Local Division
- Vienna Local Division
-
LD Mannheim, June 27, 2024, indicative decision, UPC_CFI_ 210/2023
Arguments on claim construction to be made with the Statement of Claim: According to R. 13(1)(n) RoP in cases of technically complex subject-matters, the Statement of Claim must already contain the claim construction if the patent in suit is not readily understandable on its own. In case the plaintiff does not comply, further legal issues…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, 13 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_219/2023
Extension of time limit (only) for response to redacted FRAND submission: Claimant filed its reply brief with heavy redactions re. the FRAND part. Hence, upon Defendant’s request the deadline for filing its rejoinder brief was extended as it relates to these redactions. However, as the parts re. infringement and validity of the patent were not…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Mannheim, May 16, 2024, order re. producing license agreements, UPC_CFI_216/2023
The order to produce license agreements could be inappropriate if the alleged infringer was unwilling to take a license from the beginning: Scope of the order to produce license agreements in view of the SEP holder’s duty of transparency established by the ECJ: In the present case, the claimant already submitted few comparable license agreements.…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, April 30, 2024, Order re producing license agreements, UPC_CFI_ 218/2023, UPC_CFI_ 219/2023, UPC_CFI_ 223/2023,
Plaintiff in infringement proceedings can request an order, directed against themselves, to produce an SEP license agreement with a third party. In accordance with the principle of production of evidence (Art. 43 UPCA), the plaintiff must decide for themselves which submissions they wish to make in the proceedings.: In order to demonstrate that FRAND obligations…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, May 06, 2024, Order on separation of proceedings, UPC_CFI_ 218/2023, UPC_CFI_219/2023 und UPC_CFI_223/2023
Pursuant to R. 303.2 RoP, the court may order that proceedings initiated in relation to several defendants be heard in separate proceedings if such separation is appropriate and necessary.: If, in proceedings with several defendants, representatives have only been appointed for some of the defendants and the remaining defendants have yet to be served and…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, April 15, 2024, order pursuant to R. 323 RoP (language of the proceedings), UPC_CFI_410/2023
Change of language of the proceedings into the language in which the patent was granted: The decision whether or not to change the language of the proceedings into the language in which the patent was granted shall be determined with regard to the respective interests at stake that has to be weighted, without it being…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, 14 February 2024, order on production of documents and protection of confidential information, UPC_CFI_210/2023
Order of a confidentiality regime step-by-step from uploading the document to the decision and any requests for access to the file: The regime reflects the interest – typically arising from the provision in license agreements that the contract may only be produced upon a court order – that the respective licence agreement partner shall be…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, 8 September 2023, procedural order re. alternative method of service, UPC_CFI_219/2023
Mandatory requirement of R. 275.2 RoP is a previous attempt to effect service in accordance with R. 270 to 274 RoP : R. 270 to 274 RoP do not provide for the possibility of service at a place of business within the Contracting Member States for defendants having their seat outside thereof; R. 271.5 RoP…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.