Institutions: Munich Local Division
- Brussels Local Division
- Central Division
- Duesseldorf Local Division
- Hamburg Local Division
- Helsinki Local Division
- Lisbon Local Division
- Local Division
- Luxembourg Court of Appeal
- Mannheim Local Division
- Milan Central Division
- Milan Local Division
- Munich Central Division
- Munich Local Division
- Nordic-Baltic Regional Division
- Paris Central Division
- Paris Local Division
- President of Court of First Instance
- Regional Division
- The Hague Local Division
- Vienna Local Division
-
LD Munich, 12 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_54/2024
Change of language of proceedings upon (unobjected) request: In the absence of an objection from the opposing party, the language of the proceedings shall be changed from German to English, i.e. the language in which the patent at issue has been granted. There was no request that existing pleadings and other documents should be translated.…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, May 27, 2024, Order on request to extend and to shorten a deadline, UPC_CFI_498/2023
It is a reason for a term extension if wrong exhibits to which reference is made in the Statement of claim have been made available via the CMS: According to case law of the Court of Appeals (UPC-CoA_320/2023; APFL_572929/2023) it is sufficient for an extension of the terms for lodging the Statement of Defense, if…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Munich, 18 January 2024, Order of court of first instance, UPC_CFI_9/2023
Admissibility of extending the action by including claims from a further patent-in-suit after terminated limitation proceedings: The requirements for an extension of the complaint by including claims from a further patent-in-suit are exclusively subject to Rule 263 RoP and not to national provisions. In the present case the plaintiff waited for the outcome of the…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 27, December 2023, Order of court in first instance, UPC_CFI_181/2023
Protection of confidential information (keynotes): 1. The protection of confidential information contained in pleadings and annexes can only be requested within a workflow pursuant to Rule 262 and/or 262A of the Rules of Procedure at the same time as the initial filing or within 14 days. 2. Unlike the standard practice in national proceedings in…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 19 February 2024, order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_9/2023
Example of exercise of the case management powers of the court under R. 334 RoP.: A videoconference with the parties can be designated a separate hearing under Rule 334(d) RoP, which does not preclude an interim conference under Rule 35(b) RoP. Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_9/2023 Type of proceedings Infringement Action Parties Claimant:…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 5 February 2024, decision UPC_CFI_498/2023
Electronic service of the statement of claim: Rule 275 RoP does not permit the court to designate someone as person authorised to accept service, if that person has not notified the Registry or the claimant to be willing to accept service of the statement of claim on behalf of the defendant at an electronic address…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 23 January 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_181/2023
The interim conference can be held as video conference : The recording of the interim conference can be listened to on the premises of the Munich Local Division. Potential orders in the interim conference: Potential orders in the interim conference include the determination of deadlines for further written submissions by the parties, the determination of…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 5 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_2/2023, ACT_459746/2023, App_577241/2023
Penalty payment does not require a further court order: In the event of violations of orders under Art. 62 UPCA, a penalty payment may be imposed without a further court enforcement order in accordance with Art. 82 (4) UPC The requirements for the imposition of penalty payments are exhaustively regulated in Art. 82 para. 4…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023
A notification by the judge-rapporteur under Rule 20.2 RoP that a preliminary objection is to be dealt in the main proceedings cannot be challenged on appeal, nor can it be made the subject of a review by the panel pursuant to Rule 333.1 RoP.: The judge-rapporteur and not the panel shall decide on inadmissible applications…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023
Possibility for parties to comment on separation of subject matter of extension of complaint due to procedural reasons.: Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023 Type of proceedings Action for infringement Parties Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Plaintiff)NETGEAR Deutschland GmbH, Netgear Inc. and Netgear International Limited (Defendants) Patent(s) EP3611989 and EP3678321 Body of legislation /…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 20 December 2023, order of court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_292/2023
The original version of a claim of an European patent and any amendments made thereto during the grant proceedings can be used as aid for interpreting the claim. : In principle, a party unsuccessfully applying for provisional measures has to bear the costs incurred by the other party for filing a protective letter.: Division Local…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 4 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_213/2023, 220/2023, 224/2023
The determination of the date of service of the complaint and the grant of an extension of the deadline for the statement of defense in agreement with parties is possible.: Division Local Division Munich UPC number UPC_CFI_213/2023, 220/2023, 224/2023 Type of proceedings Action for infringement Parties Panasonic Holdings Corporation (Plaintiff) and 1 Xiaomi Inc.2 Beijing…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 11 December 2023, order of the court of first instance of the UPC, UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023, App_587438/2023
the termination of limitation proceedings for such patent is admissible.: Rule 263 RoP allows the amendment of a pending case under certain conditions. In this case, the Plaintiff extended the pending complaint by asserting claims from a further patent, after the limitation proceedings for this patent were concluded. The court found this extension to be…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 3 November 2023, order on language of the proceedings, UPC_CFI_14/2023
Change of language of the proceedings: An infringement action was filed in German before the LD Munich. Before the statement of defense was filed, the Defendant suggested a change of the language of the proceedings to English, which is the language of the granted European Patent. The judge-rapporteur proposed to change the language of the…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 29 September 2023, order, UPC_CFI_15/2023
Filing of preliminary objection via an inappropriate workflow: Filing of preliminary objection via an inappropriate workflow is to be rejected as inadmissible (Article 42.2 UPCA). However, due to the early stage of the UPC proceedings and the resulting lack of experience with the UPC and its Rules of Procedure, the preliminary objection in the current…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 27 September 2023, procedural order, UPC_CFI_5/2023
Requirements of service by an alternative method: Alternative service (R. 275.2 RoP) is also possible if an attempt of service pursuant R. 270 to 274 RoP has not yet been completed. “Attention” can be assumed under R. 275.2 RoP if either a legal relationship exists in which knowledge is attributed or if specific circumstances exist…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, 19 September 2023, decision and orders on preliminary measures, UPC_CFI_2/2023
Rule 206 RoP only defines formal requirements: The requirements of Rule 206 RoP only need to be formally presented. If any requirement is missing materially, this does not lead to inadmissibility of the request for provisional measures. The material assessement is governed by Rule 211.2 RoP. Rule 206.2(e) RoP does not apply to requests for…
7 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.