UPC Decisions
- Brussels Local Division
- Central Division
- Duesseldorf Local Division
- Hamburg Local Division
- Helsinki Local Division
- Lisbon Local Division
- Local Division
- Luxembourg Court of Appeal
- Mannheim Local Division
- Milan Central Division
- Milan Local Division
- Munich Central Division
- Munich Local Division
- Nordic-Baltic Regional Division
- Paris Central Division
- Paris Local Division
- President of Court of First Instance
- Regional Division
- The Hague Local Division
- Vienna Local Division
-
LD Munich, 12 June 2024, Order of the Court of first instance, UPC_CFI_54/2024
Change of language of proceedings upon (unobjected) request: In the absence of an objection from the opposing party, the language of the proceedings shall be changed from German to English, i.e. the language in which the patent at issue has been granted. There was no request that existing pleadings and other documents should be translated.…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, 4 June 2024, Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_54/2023
In relation to the proprietor of a European patent there is a rebuttable presumption pursuant to R. 5(a) and (c) that the person shown in the patent register is the actual proprietor of the patent: Nevertheless, the person shown in the register can be ordered to produce evidence according to R. 190 RoP in order…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
Court of Appeal, 4 June 2024, Order of the Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_79/2024
Art. 83(3) UPCA must be interpreted such that a valid opt out application requires that it is lodged by or on behalf of all proprietors of all national parts of a European patent: According to R.5.1(b) RoP an opt-out must be made in relation to all national parts of an EP patent. In addition, …
2 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxembourg, June 4, 2024, order on withdrawal of appeal, UPC_CoA_183/2024
Applicable rule for the withdrawal of an appeal: R. 265 RoP, which has a broad scope: R. 265 RoP is primarily drafted with a view to comprehensive withdrawals of whole actions. It does neither distinguish between the first instance and the appeal proceedings nor between procedural appeal and appeals in substance. It does also not…
3 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxembourg, June 4, 2024, order on withdrawal of appeal, UPC_CoA_205/2024
Applicable rule for the withdrawal of an appeal: R. 265 RoP, which has a broad scope: R. 265 RoP is primarily drafted with a view to comprehensive withdrawals of whole actions. It does neither distinguish between the first instance and the appeal proceedings nor between procedural appeal and appeals in substance. It does also not…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, May 27, 2024, Order on request to extend and to shorten a deadline, UPC_CFI_498/2023
It is a reason for a term extension if wrong exhibits to which reference is made in the Statement of claim have been made available via the CMS: According to case law of the Court of Appeals (UPC-CoA_320/2023; APFL_572929/2023) it is sufficient for an extension of the terms for lodging the Statement of Defense, if…
2 min Reading time→ -
CoA, May 28, 2024, Order, UPC_CoA_22/2024
Regularly proceedings must be conducted in a way, which will allow the final oral hearing at first instace to take place within one year. As a general principle, the Court will not stay proceedings: Art. 33.10 UPCA and R. 295.a RoP must be applied and interpreted in accordance with the fundamental right to an effective…
6 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, May 30, 2024, order pursuant R. 323 RoP, UPC_CFI_26/2024
In infringement proceedings, the position of the defendant requesting the language of the proceedings to be changed into the language of the patent is decisive, if in the overall assessment the result of the balancing of interest is the same: Art. 49.5 UPCA must be interpreted in such a way that the decision on whether…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, May 21, 2024, order concerning security for legal costs, UPC_CFI_495/2023
Claimant’s financial situation is decisive when deciding on security for legal costs: The criterion of the Claimant’s financial situation is decisive for the Court when it has to decide whether or not to order a security for the legal costs. The Applicants (Defendants in the main proceedings) submitted that there are no public records about…
6 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, May 22, 2024, order concerning an expedition request, UPC_CoA_218/2024 et al.
Requirements for request for expedition of proceedings pursuant to R.9.3 RoP : A request to expedite appeal proceedings, namely a request to shorten any deadlines where possible pursuant to R. 225(e), R.9.3 RoP, requires the Applicant (here: Volkswagen AG) to explain that and why it would have a particular interest in the concerned brief (here:…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan, May 14, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_241/2023
The parties must submit a summary of the topics to be dealt with during the interim conference prior to the interim conference: The parties must inform the Court in advance of the interim conference which persons will participate in the interim conference: With exception of confidential information, the interim conference is open to the public:…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, May 14, 2024, order, UPC_CFI_151/2024
Security for costs in the proceedings for provisional measures: Art. 69.4 UPCA explicitly refers to proceedings for the application of provisional measures pursuant to Art. 62 UPCA. R. 158 RoP is thus also applicable in the proceedings for provisional measures. The request for a security for costs is in line with the EU law and…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, May 14, 2024, Request for leave to change claim, UPC_CFI_457/2023
The concretization of the claims by the claimant is not a mere clarification, but a subsequent unconditional and therefore always admissible limitation/change of the claim within the meaning of R. 263 (3) RoP: According to the wording of the statement of claim, the action was initially directed against all computers and electronic end devices of…
3 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxembourg, May 13, 2024, order on provisional measures, UPC_CoA_1/2024
The CoA confirmed its standards for the claim construction as stated in the order of CoA of February 26, 2024, UPC_CoA_335/2023: The patent claim is not only the starting point but also a decisive basis for determining the scope of protection of the European Patent. The interpretation of a patent claim does not depend solely…
3 min Reading time→ -
CD Paris, May 10, 2024, request for simultaneous interpretation, UPC_CFI_367_2023
As long as some of the party’s representatives speak/understand the language of the proceedings, there is no reason for simultaneous interpretation of the oral hearing pursuant to R. 109 (1), (2) sentence 1 RoP, whereby the costs arising from the simultaneous interpretation are procedural costs: It does not matter what language skills a specific representative…
3 min Reading time→ -
CD Paris, May 10, 2024, Order re Preliminary objection, UPC_CFI_589997/2023
The violation of a standstill agreement does not constitute grounds for challenging the jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court: Lack of jurisdiction can occur when a different court or a different body (as an arbitration board) which is part of a different judicial system have the power to address the dispute (‘relative’ lack of jurisdiction)…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, May 16, 2024, order re. producing license agreements, UPC_CFI_216/2023
The order to produce license agreements could be inappropriate if the alleged infringer was unwilling to take a license from the beginning: Scope of the order to produce license agreements in view of the SEP holder’s duty of transparency established by the ECJ: In the present case, the claimant already submitted few comparable license agreements.…
3 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.