Institutions: Local Division
-
LD Mannheim, July 31, 2024, Order concerning service, UPC_CFI_330/2024
Specification of address not required to be in line with political views of respective State [concerns: Hong Kong]: A further attempt to serve the Statement of Claim by alternative means or at another place pursuant to Rule 275.1 RoP shall not be required as soon as all possibilities of service under Rules 270-274 RoP have…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, August 2, 2024, Procedural order concerning Application to Amend, UPC_CFI_355/2023
Admissibility of (later) applications for amendments: If auxiliary requests filed in the context of an application for amendment of the patent are to be amended later, the scope of R. 263 RoP is not open from the outset. The conditions under which applications for amendment of the patent are admissible are laid down in R.…
3 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Munich, August 6, 2024, application for leave to change claim, UPC_CFI_41/2024
Strict application of R. 263.1 RoP regarding a party’s application for leave to change its claim: Pursuant to R. 263.2 RoP, leave shall not be granted if the party seeking the amendment cannot satisfy the Court that (a) the amendment could not have been made with reasonable diligence at an earlier stage and (b) the…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, August 6, 2024, order on service, UPC_CFI_498/2023
Preliminary objection is deemed to be proof of service to Chinese defendant: If a Chinese defendant files a preliminary objection, there is no need to wait for further proof of service from the Chinese authorities on the Chinese defendant. Division Local Division Munich, Panel 2 UPC number UPC_CFI_498/2023 Type of proceedings Infringement proceedings Parties NEC…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, August 5, 2024, subsequent request to amend patent, UPC_CFI_363_2023
Rule 30.2 RoP leaves open the time of a decision on the admission of a subsequent request for amendment of the patent: The time of the decision is at the discretion of the court. The judge-rapporteur may postpone such a decision. A rejecting order is not required. As long as the subsequent request for amendment…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, July 31, 2024, order on provisional measures, UPC_CFI_195/2024
No lack of urgency although application filed more than nine months after becoming aware of sales of attacked embodiment: Applicant became aware of sales of the attacked embodiment (mushrooms) in UPC territory in late July 2023 and filed an application for provisional measures on May 14, 2024. In the meantime, applicant, amongst others, had three…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, 24 July 2024, Procedural order of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_440/2023
Pendency of an action: The pendency of an action is determined by the date of the registration with the Division concerned – in other words, the pendency of an action is independent on whether or not the defendant has already accepted service of the statement of a claim. Same parties according to Art. 33 (4)…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan, July 23, 2024, order on application according R 262A RoP, UPC_CFI_240/2023
Restriction to “attorneys eyes only” possible under R 262A RoP, exceptional circumstances required: In the case of protection of confidential information under R. 262A RoP, the number of persons authorised to have access may not be greater than is necessary to ensure compliance with the principle of a fair trial and the right of the…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, July 22, 2024, Order on a request for confidentiality, UPC_CFI_457/2023
Generally, a confidentiality club shall include at least one natural person from an intervening party: Since the intervener shall be treated as a party in accordance with R. 315.4 RoP (unless otherwise ordered by the Court), on request according to R. 262A a confidentiality club shall comprise at least one natural person from the intervener.…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, June 19, 2024, Order of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_130/2024
LD has competence to hear the case in respect to Ireland: The court read Applicant’s application to also cover Ireland, which is a signatory state to the UPCA and therefore a Contracting Member State, even though Ireland has not yet ratified the Agreement. Pursuant to Art. 31 UPCA which provides that the international competence of…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, July 3, 2024, Order re Protection of Confidential Information, UPC_CFI_471/2023
Access to unredacted documents is restricted to a limited group: Access to the unredacted version of the responses to the complaint is restricted on the plaintiffs’ side to the following persons: a) the plaintiffs’ legal representatives and their internal support staff, There is no reason to restrict access on the part of the plaintiffs’ authorised…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Munich, July 4, 2024, orders on deadlines and confidentiality, UPC_CFI_220/2023
The deadline for submitting a Rejoinder to the Reply only runs from the time at which defendants have been served with a completely unredacted Reply to the Statement of defence.: Defendants have the right to defend themselves comprehensively, uniformly and in full knowledge of all the Claimant’s submissions in the Reply to the Statement of…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, July 4, 2024, Decision on the merits in an action for infringement with counterclaim for revocation, UPC_CFI_230/2023
The scope of the dispute brought before the Court is incontestably governed by the principle that the parties define the subject-matter of the dispute, a general principle of law which is reiterated in Art. 76(1) UPCA.: This principle allows the claimant in the main action to exclude certain acts of infringement in order to avoid…
6 min Reading time→ -
LD Düsseldorf, July 3, 2024, judgment on prior use right, award of damages and order to communicate information / lay open books, UPC_CFI_7/2023
Within the framework of Art. 28 UPCA, the user of the claimed technology can only invoke the rights granted to him by the respective national regulations of the respective contracting member states. On this basis, the existence of a right based on prior use of the invention must be substantiated for each of the protected…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, June 20, 2024, Order of the Court of First Instance, UPC_CFI_459/2023
Order to jointly hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation pursuant to Article 33(3)(a) UPCA for reasons of efficiency: Pursuant to Art. 33(3) UPCA, the LD can exercise its discretion when deciding to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA) or to refer the counterclaim for…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, June 27, 2024, indicative decision, UPC_CFI_ 210/2023
Arguments on claim construction to be made with the Statement of Claim: According to R. 13(1)(n) RoP in cases of technically complex subject-matters, the Statement of Claim must already contain the claim construction if the patent in suit is not readily understandable on its own. In case the plaintiff does not comply, further legal issues…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, June 27, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_457/2023
Deadline Extensions due to R. 242A RoP applications in FRAND proceedings: If the Defendant deals extensively with license negotiations between itself and a patent pool in the context of the substantiation of the FRAND objection raised by it, the Claimant can only respond comprehensively to this argument if he can consult with employees of the…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.