UPC Decisions
- Brussels Local Division
- Central Division
- Duesseldorf Local Division
- Hamburg Local Division
- Helsinki Local Division
- Lisbon Local Division
- Local Division
- Luxembourg Court of Appeal
- Mannheim Local Division
- Milan Central Division
- Milan Local Division
- Munich Central Division
- Munich Local Division
- Nordic-Baltic Regional Division
- Paris Central Division
- Paris Local Division
- President of Court of First Instance
- Regional Division
- The Hague Local Division
- Vienna Local Division
-
CD Paris, April 25, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI-361/2023
Key Takeaways Neither a Preliminary Objection nor the likelihood of an appeal against its rejection are relevant factors for the stay of the proceedings : Neither the fact that a Preliminary Objection has been lodged nor the likelihood of success of the appeal against the rejection of the Preliminary Objection are relevantfactors for deciding whether…
3 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxembourg, April 26, 2024, UPC_CoA_500/2023
Time period for lodging an appeal can be extended in case of an excusable error: It is true that the time period for lodging an appeal is a mandatory time limit that cannot be extended (see R. 9.4 RoP) However, an excusable error can, in exceptional circumstances, justify a derogation from that rule. That is…
2 min Reading time→ -
Contact us personally!
Tips and advice directly from our Unitary Patents professionals.
-
LD Duesseldorf, April 30, 2024, Order on provisional measures, UPC_CFI_463/2023
Rebuttable presumption that the person registered as the patent proprietor is entitled to be registered pursuant to R. 8.5 (c) RoP: If in the case of a European patent a person is registered as the patent proprietor in the respective national register, there is a rebuttable presumption that the person recorded in the respective national…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris – May 6, 2024 – UPC_CFI_440/2023 – procedural order
An intervener may not develop claims contrary to those of the party it supports, and may not autonomously develop claims and procedural modalities distinct from those offered to the party it supports.: Consequently, an intervener that has not filed a counterclaim for invalidity within the time limit set for the party they support cannot claim…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Milan – May 6, 2024 – UPC_CFI_241/2023 – confidentiality order
Request under Rule 262A RoP for a confidentiality order regarding financial information granted. Attorneys only. : Request under R. 262A RoP by plaintif for a confidentiality order granted regarding financialinformation provided pursuant to court order and pursuant to Rule 104(k) RoP. Access to confidential information is restricted to attorneys only, with the consent of the…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD The Hague, May 1, 2024, UPC_CFI_379/2023, Procedural order
Withdrawal of action pursuant to R. 265 RoP and reimbursement of court fees: An application to withdraw shall be permitted if the other party consents to the withdrawal. The Court then issues a decision declaring the proceedings closed, resp. the case terminated. The decision includes a decision on costs and the decision will be published…
2 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal – Luxembourg (LU), May 2, 2024, Order re application for suspensive effect, UPC_CoA_177/2024
According to Article 74(1) UPCA, the appeal has no suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise at the motivated request of one of the parties. : The Court of Appeal can grant the application only if the circumstances of the case justify an exception to the principle that the appeal has no suspensive…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, April 30, 2024, Order re producing license agreements, UPC_CFI_ 218/2023, UPC_CFI_ 219/2023, UPC_CFI_ 223/2023,
Plaintiff in infringement proceedings can request an order, directed against themselves, to produce an SEP license agreement with a third party. In accordance with the principle of production of evidence (Art. 43 UPCA), the plaintiff must decide for themselves which submissions they wish to make in the proceedings.: In order to demonstrate that FRAND obligations…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, May 06, 2024, Order on separation of proceedings, UPC_CFI_ 218/2023, UPC_CFI_219/2023 und UPC_CFI_223/2023
Pursuant to R. 303.2 RoP, the court may order that proceedings initiated in relation to several defendants be heard in separate proceedings if such separation is appropriate and necessary.: If, in proceedings with several defendants, representatives have only been appointed for some of the defendants and the remaining defendants have yet to be served and…
2 min Reading time→ -
LD Hamburg, April 18, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_169/2024
All service outside the contracting member states is covered by section 2, i.e. Rules 273 and 274 RoP.: If defendants are domiciled outside the territory of the contracting member states of the UPCA and have no statutory seat, central administration or principal place of business nor their own permanent or temporary place of business within…
2 min Reading time→ -
Court of Appeal, April 17, 2024, Order, UPC_CoA_101/2024
The decision on a R. 323 RoP (Art. 49(5) UPCA) request to change the language of proceedings into the language of the patent shall be based on all relevant circumstances related to the specific case and the position of the parties. Art. 49(5) UPCA provides that in particular the position of the defendant is to…
3 min Reading time→ -
LD Mannheim, April 15, 2024, order pursuant to R. 323 RoP (language of the proceedings), UPC_CFI_410/2023
Change of language of the proceedings into the language in which the patent was granted: The decision whether or not to change the language of the proceedings into the language in which the patent was granted shall be determined with regard to the respective interests at stake that has to be weighted, without it being…
2 min Reading time→ -
CoA, March 21, 2024, order, UPC_CoA_486/2023
An appeal against a decision of the judge rapporteur can be admissible if it is the subject of the appeal whether the judge rapporteur was entitled to issue the decision under appeal.: R 220.3 RoP provides for the admission of an appeal against an order issued by a panel. However, the order under appeal was…
5 min Reading time→ -
LD Paris, March 26, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_397/2023
Waiver of Rule 262A RoP: Even though Rule 262A RoP provides that the confidentiality club shall include at least one natural person from each party, the Court considers that it is possible for the parties to exclude access by a natural person by mutual agreement, provided that the principle of a fair trial is not…
1 min Reading time→ -
LD Duesseldorf, March 27, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_355/2023
Protection of confidential information requires balancing of interests: When deciding an application to grant protection for the allegedly confidential information, the court has to weigh the right of a party to have unlimited access to the documents contained in the file, which guarantees its fundamental right to be heard, against the interest of the opposing…
4 min Reading time→ -
CoA Luxemburg, April 3, 2024, UPC_CoA_433/2023 etc.
Rectification of the name of the defendant allowable in principle.: If the claimant has not correctly named the defendant in the statement initiating the proceedings, the Court may allow the claimant to rectify the error so long as the defendant is not unreasonably prejudiced by the incorrect statement of name and its rectification. In particular,…
4 min Reading time→ -
LD Dusseldorf, March 22, 2024, procedural order, UPC_CFI_463/2023
Simultanous interpretation in both directions is available for representatives who do not speak the language of the procedure.: Simultanous interpretation is available to the extent deemed appropriate (Art. 51.2 UPCA). Representatives whose language skills suffice to plead in the procedural language may not use simultanous interpretation. No prior request for simultanous interpretation needs to be…
2 min Reading time→
Stay in the loop
Never miss a beat by subscribing to the email newsletter. Please see our Privacy Policy.